I'd like to direct my question to Mr. Egan and Mr. Rondinelli jointly. My question relates to the business case for the DNA data bank.
It seems to me, as a former businessman, that once the DNA match is made to a potential criminal, the investigative requirements would be greatly reduced for law enforcement. Some of these cases can be very complex. They can cost millions of dollars to investigate and go through court.
From a very simplistic point of view, I'm wondering whether you would agree with me, because when I asked the question of the last group of witnesses, that was never factored into the cost of this program. In other words, the cost savings were never factored in for a conviction that happened very quickly versus a lengthy investigation.
Do you have any comments regarding that, in terms of policing and investigation and court time and lawyers' costs? Is there a cost savings associated with the DNA data bank?