Well, Mr. Chair, for all the reasons that you've ruled it out of order--while the other side have now overturned that--we would oppose it. It takes away what the intent of the bill was.
I'm a little bit disappointed that Madame Mourani saw fit to support the other side against your judgment. I thought we had talked previously and she had indicated that she didn't support any amendments. This particular amendment I think goes entirely against the intent of the bill. I don't know how I can be any clearer: what he's done here is not what the intent of the bill was from the very beginning.
It was the agreement we had, the understanding we had. Certainly, all of a sudden they put a value in, and that's not what the argument was through this process. The Bloc Québécois had an agreement with this party to move forward with no amendments, so I can't understand the legitimacy of where they have gone on this. When you put it into a value, it's not what the bill was, not intended to be, and I just think it's a watered-down version of the original bill.
I don't know whether Ms. Mourani wants to talk about it or not, but I'm extremely disappointed that this is going forward after you have made your decision.