I appreciate that. I don't have much time left, and I want to really quickly get one last question in.
I'd like to quote back to you a couple of sentences from your opening statement. First, you said, for those victims who wish to, there will be more occasions to provide their statements to the board. That's what you're talking about with this change. As well, “In addition, registered victims will be notified of all board ETA decisions, as well as the date and location of the temporary absence”.
Obviously, given that, given the fact that your look at this, as a board, would certainly be more open and accessible to victims than obviously that of CSC's when they're doing that, could you maybe just comment on that? I think what that tells me is that this is the more open and accessible process for victims, and that would probably make this a good move in terms of ensuring victims have better access to the hearings. So if we're looking at this, that would be an aspect that should be considered as well.
Both of you could comment, if you'd like.