No. I think the committee probably has documentation from the Library of Parliament that sets it out very well.
Temporary absences are made by Correctional Service Canada. No hearings are conducted. ETA decisions are made on an administrative basis by institutional heads and by the commissioner or a head of a region.
The other side of that is that for the decisions made by the Parole Board of Canada, the Parole Board has the discretion to hold a hearing for ETA requests. The access to those hearings is non-existent when it's done within the prison context. With the Parole Board of Canada, the victim can apply in writing to attend, which may be granted. There is no right to make a statement when the prison head grants it. When the Parole Board of Canada conducts a hearing, a victim may present a statement.
I think the other part is that inside the prison system, everything about the release remains within there. Like I said, it's not the prison warden's fault, but the system isn't as informative as it might be when it's the national parole board.