Thanks.
If we're in a debate about “should” or “may”, I don't know.... I was going to suggest “consider consistency” to make sure that it is being considered. If the debate is really now at “should”, “may” or “consider”....
Before we get to that, I would just ask for clarity.
Mr. MacSween, if we ended the amendment after “existing regulatory regimes”, is that ideal? Should we include “such as those established by provincial regulatory agencies”?
If we do leave in “such as those established by provincial regulatory agencies”, that's pretty specific to provincial regulated industries rather than existing regulatory regimes.