I think our only comment on that is that the industry doesn't have a monopoly on capable people who are designing and redesigning tech. We're certainly able to regulate what comes out of our factories and out of our labs, but some of the motivation in the criminal sphere in this space might be that it is more lucrative to work on devices that hack the original coding.
These are sophisticated and, as we said at the national summit, it's important that government and law enforcement be able to take some of these devices off the market or at least make them unavailable through things like Amazon, if you can regulate that. Certainly you can't regulate what people are willing to trade in person in dark corners, but let's try to make it a little harder.