Quite simply, I really don't understand. I understand what Mr. Julian is trying to push forward is an agenda, and I understand his synopsis on that. But I'm indeed wondering if there's anything he sees in paragraph 5(b) that may be left out.
First of all, we look at the primary purpose as being competition. Secondly, if they don't meet the objectives of the economic, environmental, and social outcomes, something else has to be done. I don't see it as being contrary, but I'm wondering if Mr. Fast isn't correct on that.
I'd like to hear from the counsel whether or not it indeed weakens the strategy of the declaration itself.