Indeed, that is the case, and I would agree with Mr. Julian and Mr. Laframboise. That's why I think we need the proviso that we have the ability to go back at any time to deal with any other section or paragraph. We might need to do so. The difficulty is, of course, that the department received some of the amendments only yesterday. As such, we haven't had a good chance to go through and look at the ramifications of them.
The will of the committee is the will of the committee. I just think it might be simpler to go through and at least deal with them on the basis that there's no contention with the issue, and to recognize that, and then, at the end of the day, if we want to go back and make changes to them or leave them open, that's totally the will of the committee. But to go through them line by line and adopt them and then find later on that we have some problems with a particular issue because of whatever reason Mr. Scott brought forward, that it might not pass, or as the case may be...we could take an analysis of that and go backwards and deal with it.
I just thought it would be simpler, and then we would at least deal with the contentious issues by themselves.