I concur with Mr. Jean, because if you look at proposed paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b), they are two parts of the whole. You refer to the competition and market forces as being the prime agents. “Prime” implies that there's a secondary group involved here--not one more important than the other, but one taking the leading role--and the secondary one is addressed in proposed paragraph 5(b). If we agree to the amendment proposed, it really contradicts what we've done in proposed paragraph 5(a). You're basically establishing two even forces competing in the marketplace, and that's my concern.
I believe our drafters have worked very hard to make sure this is balanced. We have proposed paragraphs 5(a) and 5(b). Proposed paragraph 5(a) sets out the prime. Proposed paragraph 5(b) essentially sets out the secondary role government plays if proposed paragraph 5(a) doesn't fulfill the mandate we require for transportation.
I think that's the direction you're coming from. Is that correct?