We would agree with Mr. Jean that we wouldn't have an issue with adding safety and security in the list of outcomes.
Mr. McGuinty deleted the words “occur only if they are necessary”. As we were speaking about proposed paragraph 5(a), it basically says that competition and market forces are the prime agents. If we change this wording, we are now in fact suggesting that regulation and strategic intervention become the prime force again. It is really meant to be only when market forces and competition do not provide that outcome. It changes the sense of the provision considerably.
We don't, however, have an issue with adding safety and security. That would be fine.