In our view, in fact, it highlights it more than in the previous bill. In the previous bill, as Alain said earlier, it enumerates all of the entities that are considered users in this bill. So you have shippers, and you have communities; you have everybody. In this one, all the users are categorized as one, and the one that stands out is enumerated in proposed paragraph 5(d), which is including the persons with disabilities. So in terms of highlighting it, I think this one gives it more emphasis, more priority. And everybody else is grouped together so that we don't have to enumerate everybody else who is a beneficiary or included in the provisions of this bill.
I can tell you now that if we do that, when it gets to the Senate I'm going to have a whole lot of angry shippers coming to see me asking why we didn't include the word “shippers” in there or why we didn't include the others? Trust me. We have another bill to come.
It is a concern, and we believe that paragraph (d) does give it the emphasis that it merits. And we agree with you, it's very important, and that's why it is in paragraph (d).