I believe this issue has been raised as well in another bill that has passed through the House, is before the Senate, and might come back. It's all a question of timing of when the bill actually comes into force as opposed to when it is proclaimed, which I think is what the substance of the disagreement might be.
So I look to Ms. Stanfield for a little bit of clarification. This committee has talked about the actual implementation of everything within about three years. We discussed that last week and we have a coming into force clause that's supposed to capture all the timeframes between now and when all the designated organizations will be able to get the ball rolling.
I'm wondering whether, from your perspective, legally and procedurally, the understanding that everybody should have by proposed subsection 5.38(1) is three years after the coming into force of the implemented act, or whether we're just talking about the proclamation of the act. The proclamation of the act will take place, as I understand procedures, once it has passed the other House and come back and everybody says, hey, this is kosher, let's go.
So if the intent of both the government and the other amendment by the Bloc is that it comes into play after things have been systemized, then I don't see any disharmony in the two. I would ask Mr. Laframboise to identify that.
Ms. Stanfield, what do you understand by these two?