I appreciate that, and I'll be looking for it.
Here's my concern, Mr. Minister. You've been out there advocating a P3 for the Windsor-Detroit border, which is different from the Sarnia experience, where there's special legislation and taxpayers don't have to come with funds; they do it through a cooperative binational process. And it's different from Fort Erie. It's different from Niagara Falls. It's different from everything, historically, for the most part, in Canada, in terms of our international borders and crossings.
Twice you've been out at the meeting for the Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships, and you've been out basically hoisting Windsor as an example. But in your remarks today, you say specifically, with respect to the gateways and border crossings fund, to consider whether a P3 option is feasible. I guess my concern is how you come to the conclusion that this should be a P3 project. Today you say that there's going to be a process to determine whether it's feasible, but you've already determined that it's going to be a P3.