I'm sorry, I didn't mean to put a bit of a red herring in the discussion of this bill, because the duty policy is not a part of this bill at all. I simply wanted to make the point that anything that further impedes the ability of Canadian shipowners to finance a fleet that is aging and that needs to replaced, if we're going to continue that economic activity in Canada, we would not support. It was in the context of potentially applying a lien against Canadian ships, which would mean that lenders would charge more for financing and that sort of thing. I just wanted to put that in the context of this bill.
On April 23rd, 2009. See this statement in context.