Mr. Bevington, I totally disagree with that premise, and we weren't even a party to that action. This was a disgruntled supplier. We were not even a party to it; DIAND was the party. We were not asked to appear. We presented no evidence.
This is one person's point of view, which is easy to say, particularly when you have no jurisdiction whatsoever in the matter, which CITT was found by the Federal Court of Appeal.... That is the reason why the Federal Court of Appeal quashed the decision.