In fairness, Building Canada was a seven-year program.
On the viability of projects, is viability a consideration in Metrolinx's planning? One of the things we've been talking about is that obviously capital costs are typically not recoverable in public transit projects. The cost recovery of operational funding varies. In some cases, it's high. In some cases, it's low.
There are two ways to ask this question. There's sort of a cost recovery quotient you look at and say, okay, that's a viable project and we're going to go after that. Or do you use different criteria to examine why you choose a specific priority? I'm trying to get a fix on whether we should have a quotient that says whether this is a viable project.