Well, the reason we can't define adequate and suitable service in every single incident within the legislation is that it's impossible for a bill to adapt itself alone to each circumstance. That's why we have regulation, and in this case it's why we have arbitrators who can look at the particulars of a given case and interpret what that service adequacy and suitability should be.
I want to come back to the debate over administrative monetary penalties versus liquidated damages. Are you suggesting, Mr. Gratton, that the administrative monetary penalties should be removed from the bill?