Obviously, after Lac-Mégantic, some people were concerned about the short lines or some smaller companies that are not class I, saying that they're not fulfilling their safety issue, that safety is not first; that money, like profit, is more important than safety.
You're saying that your company has come up with moving at five miles an hour through communities. You're against—well, you never use just one operator and you're not leaving your trains unattended.
One of the questions I have is that you're implementing things that are more stringent or more safe than what the regulations are. Is that correct?