Okay. What does the FCM have to say about the conclusions of the Auditor General with respect to Transport Canada? The Auditor General says, for example, he cannot determine whether there's a functioning safety management system in place. The Auditor General's concluded that on inspections and audits, 25% of the audits that had to be completed were completed. The Auditor General told us that even though Transport Canada and this government say they need 20 inspectors, they've only got 10 to enforce, inspect, audit, and regulate 31 railways, plus another 37 railways that are now on stream.
This document tells the Canadian people in black and white that enforcement is not happening, and this is the most credible voice I would argue, not the CTA, not the FCM, certainly not Transport Canada, the minister. The capacity we need to do the job to maintain SMS is not in place. Surely the FCM and the CTA have something to say about that. If you're going to propose a two-tier regime for new insurance, if you're going to propose a polluter pay principle, if you're going to talk about a massive exculpatory clause called the economics of shippers and the economics of railways, as you put it in your last couple of points, surely you're presupposing that Transport Canada is doing its job. Am I wrong here? Are Canadians wrong to conclude that they expect Transport Canada to be doing its job?