Debates of Nov. 28th, 2005
House of Commons Hansard #159 of the 38th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was transportation.
Topics
- Criminal Code
- Transportation Amendment Act
- Kawartha Participation Projects
- Ukraine
- Greater Charlottetown Area Chamber of Commerce
- Rail Transportation
- Member for Lambton—Kent—Middlesex
- Electoral Campaigns
- BioNorth
- Fabory Metrican
- Federal Court of Canada
- Income Trusts
- Member for Etobicoke--Lakeshore
- New Democratic Party
- Riding of Etobicoke--Lakeshore
- Grey Cup
- Conservative Party of Canada
- Clare Laking
- Canadian Taxpayers Federation
- Government Spending
- Income Trusts
- Public Safety
- Terasen Inc.
- Health
- Income Trusts
- Kyoto Protocol
- International Aid
- Sponsorship Program
- Chinese Canadians
- Multiculturalism
- Justice
- Income Trusts
- Canada Pension Plan
- Income Trusts
- Child Care
- Justice
- Sponsorship Program
- Income Trusts
- Health
- Human Resources and Skills Development
- Sponsorship Program
- Access to Information
- Health
- Official Languages
- Electoral Reform
- Points of Order
- Government Response to Petitions
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Committees of the House
- Excise Tax Act
- Canada Health Act
- Income Tax Act
- Canada Labour Code
- Income Tax Act
- Excise Tax Act
- Governor General Appointment and Dismissal Act
- Personal Watercraft Act
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Question No. 220
- Transportation Amendment Act
- Supply
Income Trusts
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Wascana
Saskatchewan
Liberal
Ralph Goodale Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, first, let us be clear. There is no evidence of a leak. There is an allegation on this, particularly from the opposition.
The hon. gentleman asked if I inquired within my staff and within my department. Indeed I did, and I am satisfied that all requirements were met. Beyond that, if there is further study that is required here, that is the prerogative of the Ontario Securities Commission without any political advice from across the way.
Health
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Conservative
Steven Fletcher Charleswood—St. James, MB
Mr. Speaker, Canadians are still waiting to see real action on the health care wait times. The benchmark should have been announced ages ago. The government is going to die in a few hours. The promised fix for a generation has turned out to be the biggest broken promise in a generation.
Will the government finally announce the health care waiting benchmarks or will it be another promise made, promise broken?
Health
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Vancouver South
B.C.
Liberal
Ujjal Dosanjh Minister of Health
Mr. Speaker, it is quite ironic that we were going to announce those wait times benchmarks in December. All opposition parties now want to go into an election campaign and then they ask where are the wait time benchmarks. They are coming.
For the hon. member, we shall take no lessons on health care from a party which interest is to maximize private health care. The member himself is on record saying that we should not be hung up on universality. We are going to stand up for universality in public health care in Canada.
Human Resources and Skills Development
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
Ruby Dhalla Brampton—Springdale, ON
Mr. Speaker, Canada is one of the very few countries in the world to show leadership and to offer compassionate care benefits for workers. The government recently recognized the opportunity to address the issue of the definition of caregiver and to offer hope to those Canadians in time of need.
Could the Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development please tell the House the update as to the expected changes for this very important program?
Human Resources and Skills Development
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Newmarket—Aurora
Ontario
Liberal
Belinda Stronach Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development and Minister responsible for Democratic Renewal
Mr. Speaker, the government has recognized that we can make improvements to compassionate care to reach more Canadians.
I am pleased to inform the House that we have made significant improvements to the compassionate care benefit. The benefit will be expanded beyond immediate family members. Starting next January, Canadians will now be able to designate a person of their choice to care for them. This means not only temporary income support, but also job security. This is great news for Canadians.
Sponsorship Program
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Conservative
Paul Forseth New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC
Mr. Speaker, the government designed and executed ad scam for the benefit of the Liberal Party. At least 565 individuals and groups were involved in the scheme over many years. The Liberals claimed that they made a down payment on the money stolen from taxpayers, with a $1.14 million pay back cheque to the Government of Canada.
To be sure that the Liberals are telling the truth this time, will the government release a copy of both sides of the cancelled down payment cheque that is supposed to have been received from the Liberal Party?
Sponsorship Program
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Kings—Hants
Nova Scotia
Liberal
Scott Brison Minister of Public Works and Government Services
Mr. Speaker, members have reached a new low over there. The fact is the Liberal Party of Canada has paid every penny received inappropriately back to the Canadian taxpayer, based on an analysis of Justice Gomery's report. At the end of the day, we Liberals stand with Canadians who believe in the work and the analysis of Justice Gomery who heard from 172 witnesses and reviewed over 28 million pages of documents.
Justice Gomery is interested in getting to the truth. That is what Canadians want. They do not want to go to the polls, which is all the Conservatives want.
Access to Information
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
Conservative
Helena Guergis Simcoe—Grey, ON
Mr. Speaker, on top of its culture of entitlement, the government has earned a reputation for its culture of secrecy.
Access to Information
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
Liberal
Access to Information
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
Conservative
Helena Guergis Simcoe—Grey, ON
The access to information commissioner has noted that the federal government remains seized with a culture of distrust and resistance to the law that is supposed to give the public access to government documents. Canadians want to get to the bottom of Liberal corruption.
Could the current government assure us that should Canadians vote for a change of government in the next election, there will be no systematic shredding of documents and destruction of records?
Access to Information
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
Winnipeg South
Manitoba
Liberal
Reg Alcock President of the Treasury Board and Minister responsible for the Canadian Wheat Board
Mr. Speaker, should such a--
Access to Information
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Access to Information
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
The Speaker
Order, please. I am trying to get a little order so we can all hear the minister. The President of the Treasury Board has the floor. The hon. member for Simcoe—Grey is anxious to hear the answer. I cannot hear the answer and he is sitting closer to me than he is to her. We will have a little order.
Access to Information
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
Liberal
Reg Alcock Winnipeg South, MB
Mr. Speaker, I am sorry, I missed the reference to jewellery. Let me repeat my comment, should such an unlikely circumstance come to pass, the government will respect all policies as it always does.
Health
Oral Question Period
November 28th, 2005 / 3 p.m.
Bloc
Réal Ménard Hochelaga, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Health announced on November 18 that his government and the legal representatives of individuals infected by the hepatitis C virus before 1986 and after 1990 had reached an agreement. The agreement concerns only the submission of technical data, and nothing conclusive has been negotiated with regard to compensation.
Will the Minister of Health admit that his November 18 press release is nothing more than hokum, that no victim of hepatitis C has been compensated and that no significant agreement has been signed to date?
