Debates of May 30th, 2005
House of Commons Hansard #104 of the 38th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was budget.
Topics
- Symbol for the House of Commons
- Committees of the House
- Symbol for the House of Commons
- Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec Act
- Committees of the House
- Economic Development Agency of Canada for the Regions of Quebec Act
- Department of Human Resources and Skills Development Act
- University of Prince Edward Island
- Fisheries
- Cecilioni Award
- Johanne Bécu
- Boreal Forest
- Meritorious Service Medal
- Post-Secondary Education
- Sustainable Development
- Welland Rose Festival
- Post-Secondary Education
- 2005 World Driving Championships
- National Defence
- The Memorial Cup
- Softwood Lumber
- Health
- The Budget
- Association des traumatisés cranio-cérébraux
- Sponsorship Program
- Member for Newton—North Delta
- Access to Information
- Sponsorship Program
- Canada Post
- Sponsorship Program
- Infrastructure
- The Budget
- Fisheries
- Maher Arar Inquiry
- Trade
- Canadian Wheat Board
- Child Care
- Airports
- The Environment
- Correctional Service of Canada
- Justice
- Fisheries
- Health
- The Environment
- Sponsorship Program
- Government Response to Petitions
- Certificates of Nomination
- Order in Council Appointments
- National Defence and Veterans Affairs
- Criminal Code
- Committees of the House
- Corrections and Conditional Release Act
- Criminal Code
- Corrections and Conditional Release Act
- Budget Implementation Act, 2005
- Business of the House
- Budget Implementation Act, 2005
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Question No. 142
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Question No. 132
- Question No. 134
- Question No. 135
- Question No. 136
- Question No. 137
- Budget Implementation Act, 2005
- Business of Supply
- Committees of the House
- Budget Implementation Act, 2005
Health
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Vancouver South
B.C.
Liberal
Ujjal Dosanjh Minister of Health
Mr. Speaker, we respect the provincial jurisdiction with respect to capital health infrastructure. We have provided over $42 billion over the next 10 years for health services and delivery. The basic infrastructure must come from the province itself in terms of the bricks and mortar.
The Environment
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
NDP
Jean Crowder Nanaimo—Cowichan, BC
Mr. Speaker, in Canada greenhouse gas emissions are growing faster than our economy. We have the top industrial polluters on the continent, but nearly $1.5 billion to reduce air pollution sits idle.
Canadians deserve clean air. Health Canada says that 6,000 Canadians die each year from air pollution.
The funding announcements have been made, but where is the action? When will the Liberal government actually enforce pollution reduction?
The Environment
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Saint-Laurent—Cartierville
Québec
Liberal
Stéphane Dion Minister of the Environment
Mr. Speaker, it is true that we need to do more, but the fact is that pollution is decreasing in Canada. It is not increasing. If we compare with 1998 levels, Canada actually decreased its emissions of pollution by 13%. What is quite good is that metal recycling increased by 36%.
We are going in the right direction, but it is true that we need to do more.
Sponsorship Program
Oral Question Period
2:55 p.m.
Conservative
Rob Nicholson Niagara Falls, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Liberal government has claimed all along that it supports the Gomery commission and that it wants Mr. Justice Gomery to do his work. At the same time, the biggest Liberal of the last 20 years, Jean Chrétien, and Alfonso Gagliano are doing their very best to shut down the Gomery commission.
Why does the Prime Minister not get all his friends together, all the prominent Liberals, and let Mr. Justice Gomery do the work that he is commissioned to do? Why does he not get his friends together and give them that message?
Sponsorship Program
Oral Question Period
3 p.m.
Kings—Hants
Nova Scotia
Liberal
Scott Brison Minister of Public Works and Government Services
Mr. Speaker, the fact is the Prime Minister has and will continue to support Justice Gomery's work. The government has been clear that it does not agree with the actions taken by Mr. Chrétien or Mr. Gagliano, but they do have rights as individuals to defend themselves and to take such actions.
If the hon. member is suggesting that the Prime Minister should engage in witness tampering and try to interfere in that regard, I can tell him that what he is suggesting is shameful. It either demonstrates a lack of understanding of the law or that the Prime Minister engage in inappropriate behaviour and this Prime Minister would not do that.
Government Response to Petitions
Routine Proceedings
3 p.m.
Beauséjour
New Brunswick
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to table, in both official languages, the government's response to 36 petitions.
Certificates of Nomination
Routine Proceedings
3 p.m.
Beauséjour
New Brunswick
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, I am tabling three certificates of nomination which will be referred to the appropriate standing committees.
Order in Council Appointments
Routine Proceedings
3 p.m.
Beauséjour
New Brunswick
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons
Mr. Speaker, I am tabling a number of orders in council recently made by the government.
National Defence and Veterans Affairs
Routine Proceedings
3 p.m.
Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca
B.C.
Liberal
Keith Martin Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of National Defence
Mr. Speaker, it is a pleasure today to table, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), in both official languages, two copies of the document “Fiscal Year 2003-2004, the Annual Report to the Standing Committee on National Defence and Veterans Affairs on the quality of life in the Canadian Forces”.
Criminal Code
Routine Proceedings
3 p.m.
Mount Royal
Québec
Liberal
Irwin Cotler Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-53, An Act to Amend the Criminal Code (proceeds of crime) and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act and to make consequential amendments to another Act.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)
Committees of the House
Routine Proceedings
3 p.m.
Conservative
Charlie Penson Peace River, AB
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 11th report of the Standing Committee on Finance.
In accordance with the order of reference of Monday, January 31, 2005, your committee has considered Bill C-259, an act to amend the Excise Tax Act (elimination of excise tax on jewellery) and agreed on Thursday, May 19 to report it back with one amendment.
Committees of the House
Routine Proceedings
3 p.m.
Liberal
John Maloney Welland, ON
Mr. Speaker, I have the honour to present, in both official languages, the 11th report of the Standing Committee on Justice, Human Rights, Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness.
Your committee adopted a motion on Thursday, May 19 in response to the recent remarks made by the chief justice of the Appeal Court of Quebec, Michel Robert, and agreed to undertake a study of the process for appointing judges within the federal judgeship nomination.
Corrections and Conditional Release Act
Routine Proceedings
May 30th, 2005 / 3:05 p.m.
Conservative
Kevin Sorenson Crowfoot, AB
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-399, An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act and the Prisons and Reformatories Act (conditional release).
Mr. Speaker , I have a number of private member's bills that I would like to introduce today.
First, I rise to reintroduce this private member's bill which, if enacted, would amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to provide that any person who received a sentence as a result of being convicted of an indictable offence while on conditional release would be obliged to serve the remainder of the original sentence and at least two-thirds of the new sentence.
In addition it provides that where a person was convicted on more than one occasion of an indictable offence committed while on conditional release, the person would not be eligible for conditional release with respect to any new sentence.
This private member's bill is introduced out of respect and honour for the hard work of the Canadian Police Association, representing 26,000 members. The CPA diligently endeavours to make this country a safer place.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)
Criminal Code
Routine Proceedings
3:05 p.m.
Conservative
Kevin Sorenson Crowfoot, AB
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-400, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (elimination of conditional sentencing).
Mr. Speaker, I rise to reintroduce my private member's bill which, if enacted, would repeal sections 742 to 742.7 of the Criminal Code. These sections allow the courts to impose conditional sentences which are to be served in the community in respect of convictions for offences for which a minimum term of imprisonment is not prescribed.
Since the introduction of conditional sentences by the current government, numerous violent criminals, including rapists, have served no jail time for their crimes. If the guiding principle of our justice system is the protection of society, then all violent criminals should spend an appropriate period of time behind bars.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)
Criminal Code
Routine Proceedings
3:05 p.m.
Conservative
Kevin Sorenson Crowfoot, AB
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-401, an act to amend the Criminal Code and the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (sexual assault on child--dangerous offenders).
Mr. Speaker, this is another of my private members' bills from the previous Parliament which I would like to reintroduce in this Parliament. This bill, if enacted, would allow the courts to designate an offender who has been convicted of two or more sexual offences against a child as a dangerous offender.
Furthermore, it would ensure that an offender with such a designation would not be released on parole, unescorted temporary absence, or statutory release unless at least two psychiatrists determined that the offender was not likely to reoffend or pose a threat to persons under the age of 18. It is a pleasure to reintroduce this bill.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)
