Debates of Nov. 9th, 2006
House of Commons Hansard #80 of the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was judges.
Topics
- Question Period
- Committees of the House
- National Capital Act
- Petitions
- Committees of the House
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Judges Act
- Criminal Code
- Ways and Means
- Criminal Code
- Remembrance Day
- Parks Canada
- Émile Boudreau
- Canadian Heritage
- Children's Fitness Tax Credit
- Frank Calder
- Veterans
- Lawyers without Borders Quebec
- Tournesol School in Thetford Mines
- Remembrance Day
- Commonwealth Games
- Remembrance Day
- Literacy
- Amateur Hockey
- Proudly She Marched
- Universal Child Care Benefit
- The Environment
- Afghanistan
- The Environment
- Middle East
- Ethics
- Veterans Affairs
- Gun Control
- Public Works and Government Services
- Federal-Provincial Relations
- Literacy
- Agriculture
- Income Trusts
- Justice
- Canadian Wheat Board
- International Cooperation
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Pensions
- Business of the House
- Points of Order
- Criminal Code
- Committees of the House
- Criminal Code
- DNA Identification Act
Remembrance Day
Statements By Members
2:10 p.m.
NDP
Jack Layton Toronto—Danforth, ON
Mr. Speaker, I rise today on behalf of New Democrats to honour the service and sacrifice of our veterans and the more than 100,000 Canadians who did not return home from war.
On Remembrance Day we will pay tribute and give thanks to the soldiers, nurses and others who served and gave their lives for Canadians. They made the ultimate sacrifice so that we could live free, but we also must honour the veterans who served courageously and returned with the memories of fallen comrades and the horrors of war. They too made the sacrifices and they bear a burden that the rest of us can barely imagine.
Remembrance Day is our connection to the past. We must celebrate this connection to ensure that the lessons of history guide us and help us create a better future.
It is my privilege, on behalf of all NDP members, to thank the courageous people who served Canada. We will never forget your sacrifices.
Literacy
Statements By Members
2:10 p.m.
Liberal
David McGuinty Ottawa South, ON
Mr. Speaker, I would like to welcome the literacy advocates who have come from across Canada to be here on Parliament Hill today, to commemorate Literacy Action Day.
This year marks the 13th anniversary of this important day. In Canada, nine million working-age adults do not read well enough to succeed in our knowledge-based society. The federal government must remedy this situation immediately.
The Conservatives claim they are spending $80 million on literacy but refuse to show us how or where they are spending it.
Canadians have watched the Conservatives' cruel so-called fat-trimming exercise and listened to a cabinet minister liken it to going without a cup of coffee for a week.
Conservative cuts to federal literacy funding have undermined the quantity and quality of literacy services across the country. The Liberal caucus calls upon the Prime Minister to immediately restore the funding for literacy programs in Canada.
Amateur Hockey
Statements By Members
2:10 p.m.
Bloc
Luc Malo Verchères—Les Patriotes, QC
Mr. Speaker, Quebeckers are passionate about hockey and have a genuine love affair with the sport. Every week throughout Quebec, players of all ages, including a growing number of girls and women, get together to practice the sport. Our ice rinks have become important meeting places. Passion for the sport no doubt contributes to its popularity and longevity. Hockey has become quite a tradition in Quebec, even a family affair.
All these games and tournaments could not be held without the efforts of hundreds of volunteers who, through their constant support and enthusiasm, have made amateur hockey in Quebec the flourishing sport it is today. From parents to coaches to referees, they all give generously of their time so that the players can develop their skills and practice the sport in the best possible conditions.
During this week of celebration for amateur hockey, the members of the Bloc Québécois would like to take this opportunity to commend and thank the volunteers, parents and players.
Proudly She Marched
Statements By Members
2:15 p.m.
Liberal
Karen Redman Kitchener Centre, ON
Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to rise in the House today to recognize the launch of a new book and video: Proudly She Marched: Training Canada's World War II Women in Waterloo County. This book and DVD are the product of a research project undertaken by the Canadian Federation of University Women of Kitchener-Waterloo.
During World War II, Canadian women served for the first time in military uniform. Over 45,000 women enlisted: 21,624 with the Canadian Women's Army Corps, 17,030 with the Royal Canadian Air Force Women's Division, and 6,783 with the Women's Royal Canadian Naval Service.
Two of the largest military training centres for women were located in Waterloo county. Although these bustling military camps were significant parts of their communities and of great local interest, they have been virtually forgotten until now.
In its major book and video project, the Kitchener-Waterloo branch of CFUW has taken up the challenge of uncovering history. As we approach Remembrance Day, I ask this House to join me in paying special tribute to the women who have served Canada in uniform.
Universal Child Care Benefit
Statements By Members
2:15 p.m.
Conservative
Colin Carrie Oshawa, ON
Mr. Speaker, while the Liberal leadership wannabe from Etobicoke—Lakeshore has called the universal child care benefit a terrible use of public funds, the NDP's devious hidden agenda has also been exposed.
Christmas will not be here for a while, but the NDP grinches are already at work threatening to rob Canadian families of precious social development programs.
Through a motion introduced at the human resources committee, the NDP has proposed to effectively take away the universal child care benefit from Canadian families.
This meanspirited NDP assault on Canadian families is shameful. Then again, what else can we expect from a party that is so out of touch with the daily realities of working Canadian families?
Unlike the NDP and the Liberals, Canada's new government will stand up for the choice in child care benefits and stand up for Canadian families.
The Environment
Oral Questions
November 9th, 2006 / 2:15 p.m.
Toronto Centre
Ontario
Liberal
Bill Graham Leader of the Opposition
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister has always refused to take a serious position on climate change. He continues to maintain that it does not exist. His party is opposed to the Kyoto protocol. His government is opposed to specific targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. As for the Minister of the Environment, when we can find her she just muddies the waters.
We have put forward a proposal with four points establishing a strong Canadian position. Will the Prime Minister save Canada's reputation and tell his minister to defend this position in Nairobi?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, on the contrary, this government was the first to present a serious plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and the number of air pollutants in Canada. With regard to his government's record, I can quote the Liberal member for Kings—Hants:
Instead the government's plan in terms of the Kyoto agreement was basically written on the back of an airplane napkin on the way to Kyoto. There was no long term planning. There was no real negotiation with the provinces or with industry sectors. In fact it was a last minute, hastily drafted agreement.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:15 p.m.
Toronto Centre
Ontario
Liberal
Bill Graham Leader of the Opposition
Mr. Speaker, Canadians have seen that the emperor has no clothes; 71% of them are telling him the Conservatives have no plan whatsoever.
What we are asking is that the Prime Minister change a course which is a disaster for our environment, a disaster for our foreign policy and a gross abandonment of our responsibility for the world.
Will he not face the evidence that the planet is more important than any neo-conservative anti-climate change ideology? Will he order his minister to follow a sensible course of action in Nairobi? Will he order her to stop trying to destroy the Kyoto protocol and to adopt some short term targets, fund projects in the developing world and set ambitious concrete goals for the next phase of Kyoto which is essential for our planet?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, the previous emperor had no clothes on Kyoto. That is why the people of Canada changed the emperor in the last election campaign.
Let me quote once again one of his own members, the member for Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca who said the following:
Unfortunately Kyoto is a shell game. My friend knows well that the [Liberal] government has made this into a shell game. We are to pay countries like Russia to buy the ability to produce greenhouse gases. We will produce the same amount of greenhouse gases and say disingenuously that we have met our commitments.
That was the plan of the previous government. It is not the plan of this government.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Toronto Centre
Ontario
Liberal
Bill Graham Leader of the Opposition
Mr. Speaker, I am not sure what planet the new government is living on, but the rest of us are trying to save planet Earth.
The Minister of the Environment has wasted this year as the world chair on climate change. Not only is she going to the conference in Kenya with no prescription for global action, she is going with zero plan for Canadian action. The Minister of the Environment is not a leader on the environment. She is an anti-leader.
Will the Prime Minister order his minister to quit trying to undermine Kyoto? Will he adopt the sensible non-partisan plan that was proposed this morning by the opposition parties?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of the Environment is going to Nairobi as the first minister of the environment in the history of this country who has tabled legislation to deal with the problem of greenhouse gases.
The party opposite signed Canada on to Kyoto a decade ago, for 13 years did not produce a single plan, and now has the gall to actually suggest that the Liberals would go to Nairobi and commit us to even more targets while we are still waiting to see their plan after 13 years.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Liberal
Lucienne Robillard Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC
Mr. Speaker, Canadians and most members of this House are demanding that Canada attain the Kyoto protocol targets and want stringent targets for phase two.
Most other countries are willing to take bold steps to fight climate change. The consensus is clear.
What more does the minister need in order to take action? Why is she sabotaging international efforts? When will the Conservatives stop playing politics and side with the rest of the planet?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Edmonton—Spruce Grove
Alberta
Conservative
Rona Ambrose Minister of the Environment
Mr. Speaker, Canada's clean air act will enable us to meet our Kyoto protocol obligations, except for the unattainable targets set by the Liberals. We will set new targets in order to make real progress, together with our international partners. We hope that the Liberals will support Canada's clean air act.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Liberal
Lucienne Robillard Westmount—Ville-Marie, QC
Mr. Speaker, Canadians are fed up with the minister's doublespeak. The environment is their top priority. They have the right to know what she has ordered her senior officials to say in Nairobi.
Will the minister continue to dig in her heels and refuse to listen to Canadians who believe in Kyoto, or will she stand up in this place and promise to meet the short-term Kyoto protocol targets? In light of the consensus at the Montreal conference, will she give her unqualified support to more stringent targets for phase two?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Edmonton—Spruce Grove
Alberta
Conservative
Rona Ambrose Minister of the Environment
Mr. Speaker, we have been honest with Canadians, honest with our international partners and honest with ourselves, compared to the last government. We have said to the international community,we are committed to the Kyoto protocol, committed to working with them, but we cannot meet the unachievable, unreachable targets set by the former government.
I would encourage the hon. member to go to the United Nations website or the Environment Canada website, which has all of our position related to Kyoto posted there for everyone to see, before we leave for Nairobi.
