Debates of Feb. 27th, 2007
House of Commons Hansard #119 of the 39th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was banks.
Topics
- Question Period
- Main Estimates, 2007-08
- Government Response to Petitions
- Committees of the House
- National Cemetery of Canada Act
- Points of Order
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Bank Act
- CN Rail
- Gasoline Prices
- Gaétan Innes
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Jean-Marie Guay
- Sylvia Lawton and Pauline Fitzpatrick
- Edmonton Oilers
- Kruger
- The Environment
- University of Manitoba
- Anti-terrorism Act
- Hamilton AIDS Network
- Passports
- Heart Disease
- Iran
- Anti-terrorism Act
- Quebec Elections
- Infrastructure
- Government of Canada
- Afghanistan
- Status of Women
- Finance
- Fisheries Act, 2007
- Democratic Reform
- Government Programs
- Status of Women
- Softwood Lumber
- Oil and Gas Industry
- Fisheries
- Arctic Sovereignty
- Citizenship and Immigration
- Afghanistan
- Government Programs
- Points of Order
- Bank Act
- Competition Act
- Business of Supply
- Anti-terrorism Act
- Committees of the House
- Criminal Code
Status of Women
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Bloc
Nicole Demers Laval, QC
Mr. Speaker, the minister previously stated that the safety of women had improved due to an increase in peace officers who patrol the streets.
Are we to understand from the minister's remarks that she wants to transfer funds from Status of Women Canada to public safety to improve services to women? Is this the new strategy of the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women?
Status of Women
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Durham
Ontario
Conservative
Bev Oda Minister of Canadian Heritage and Status of Women
Mr. Speaker, as we have reiterated, this government believes that we have to help women directly in their daily lives. Therefore, any application for funding and support that will do that in every community through organizations will be supported if they qualify.
Finance
Oral Questions
February 27th, 2007 / 2:35 p.m.
Liberal
John McCallum Markham—Unionville, ON
Mr. Speaker, when the Liberals took office, they inherited a $42 billion deficit and they cleaned up this mess. When this government came to office, it inherited huge surpluses.
How can a government that is swimming in money increase taxes, cut social programs, reduce transfers to the provinces and refuse to help industries and workers in need?
Finance
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Whitby—Oshawa
Ontario
Conservative
Jim Flaherty Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, I am not sure if there was a question there.
I agree with the hon. member opposite that Canadians are overtaxed. He said it this weekend. I agree with him. We took great strides last year in budget 2006 with $20 billion in tax reduction for Canadians over the course of two years. There will be more tax reductions as we move forward with budget 2007.
I agree with the member for Markham—Unionville. Canadians are overtaxed.
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
John McCallum Markham—Unionville, ON
Mr. Speaker, not even a raving socialist finance minister would raise income tax when he is drowning in money, but when the--
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Peter Milliken
Order. The hon. member for Markham—Unionville seems to have got into some difficulty by using the word “raving”, so perhaps we could avoid this kind of adjective and just proceed with the question and we would have less noise, if I may use that term. The hon. member for Markham—Unionville has the floor. We will have a little order, please.
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
John McCallum Markham—Unionville, ON
Mr. Speaker, when the tax hike is imposed by a man who says Canadians are overtaxed and who far from being a socialist is a neo-conservative who wants to jail the homeless, then one is truly at a loss to explain such bizarre behaviour.
Does the minister of gimmicks regret that he ballooned his already massive surplus by raising income tax?
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Whitby—Oshawa
Ontario
Conservative
Jim Flaherty Minister of Finance
Mr. Speaker, I insist that the member opposite apologize for calling me a raving socialist finance minister. I have family; I have children. This cuts to the bone.
I do agree with the member for Markham—Unionville that Canadians are overtaxed. We are working to fix that.
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Yasmin Ratansi Don Valley East, ON
Mr. Speaker, the behaviour of the minister of gimmicks grows even more bizarre. Why do he and the Prime Minister claim that they cut income tax when every Canadian who is filling out his or her income tax form this year knows that the tax rate went up, not down? Does he think that Canadians are stupid?
The government axed programs that supported the most vulnerable, literacy and youth programs, as well as those that helped minorities, such as the court challenges program. Will the finance minister promise to reinstate funding to these programs?
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Whitby—Oshawa
Ontario
Conservative
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Conservative
Jim Flaherty Whitby—Oshawa, ON
Ralph, relax, we are going to deal with it. I am going to answer the question.
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Peter Milliken
Whether the minister is going to answer the question or not is not the issue. He will respond, but he will address the Chair, I am sure, in his remarks, rather than the former minister of finance.
Finance
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Conservative
Jim Flaherty Whitby—Oshawa, ON
Mr. Speaker, not only did we reduce income taxes last year so that every Canadian in every tax category would pay less income tax this year on average than they did in preceding years, but also we reduced the GST by a full percentage point and we also created a $100 payment for each child under the age of six across the country, all of which are most welcomed by Canadians.
