Debates of March 13th, 2008
House of Commons Hansard #66 of the 39th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was afghanistan.
Topics
- Question Period
- Canadian Security Intelligence Service
- Government Response to Petitions
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Committees of the House
- Organ Donor Registry Act
- Criminal Code
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Afghanistan
- Points of Order
- Afghanistan
- Global Citizen Week
- Rosalinda Cantiveros
- Morin Heights Tragedy
- Marouane Aboudraz
- Royden Taylor
- Kidney Disease
- Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
- Canada Post
- Human Rights
- Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada
- The Environment
- Health Care
- National Francophonie Week
- Tragedy in Morin Heights
- French language Media
- Liberal Party of Canada
- Vacancy
- Ethics
- Government Accountability
- Canada-U.S. Relations
- Ethics
- Afghanistan
- Public Works and Government Services
- Airbus
- Justice
- Afghanistan
- Ethics
- Foreign Affairs
- Afghanistan
- Citizenship and Immigration
- Science and Technology
- HIV-AIDS
- Rivière-Rouge—Mont-Tremblant International Airport
- Airbus
- Foreign Affairs
- Fisheries
- Agriculture
- Canada-U.S. Relations
- Ontario Economy
- Privilege
- Points of Order
- Ways and Means
- Message from the Senate
- Committees of the House
- Afghanistan
- Royal Assent
- Afghanistan
- Competition Act
Foreign Affairs
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Beauce
Québec
Conservative
Maxime Bernier Minister of Foreign Affairs
Mr. Speaker, Canada has one China policy. We have serious concerns about the human rights situation in Tibet. We have consistently urged China to respect freedom: freedom of expression, freedom of association, and freedom of religion for all Tibetans. These latest developments in Tibet are very troubling for us and for Canadians. We urge China to respect the right of Tibetans to peaceful protest and to take steps to improve the human rights situation in Tibet.
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
NDP
Dawn Black New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC
Mr. Speaker, for over a year now the government has been stonewalling its own Military Police Complaints Commission investigation of the treatment of detainees in Afghanistan. Now there are concerns that the government will not give the complaints commission the resources it needs to carry out its lawful investigation.
My question is for the President of the Treasury Board. Will the MPCC get the funds it needs to pursue the public investigation? Will the minister guarantee in this House today that the MPCC will get the resources it needs?
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence and Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Mr. Speaker, as an agent of the government, I am sure that this particular commission, should it choose to pursue this avenue, which it appears it will, will get the cooperation with respect both to information disclosures and the funding necessary to have a full-blown hearing if this is the direction in which it intends to go.
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
NDP
Dawn Black New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC
Mr. Speaker, I and others have been trying for almost two years to access documents concerning possible torture and abuse in Afghan prisons, but the government has refused, on every occasion, everyone who has asked for the information. The chair of the MPCC has made it clear the government has refused to release documents to his investigation, documents that the commission has requested over and over again.
For the Minister of Public Safety, will Correctional Service Canada hand over all relevant documents requested by the MPCC without delay? Will it do that?
Afghanistan
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Central Nova
Nova Scotia
Conservative
Peter MacKay Minister of National Defence and Minister of the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Mr. Speaker, as I said, this is a very revealing letter from Alain Préfontaine, senior counsel, civil litigation section, in response to concerns about disclosure. It states, “Based on our experience to date, it would appear that the Government's cooperative approach is working quite well”.
The letter also states quite clearly that the approach with respect to disclosure “places the Commission in the same position it would enjoy if it were to convene a public hearing into the complaints and in the same position as a superior court”.
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Liberal
Maurizio Bevilacqua Vaughan, ON
Mr. Speaker, by 2011 100% of Canada's net labour force growth will come from immigration.
While Canada is faced with a declining birth rate, an aging population and labour shortages, recent media reports indicate that the Conservative government plans to deal with these challenges by shutting the door on immigrants.
Why does the minister believe that shutting the door on immigration is the answer?
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Haldimand—Norfolk
Ontario
Conservative
Diane Finley Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member has it completely backwards. It was in fact the Liberal government that allowed the backlog of immigration applications to balloon from 50,000 to over 800,000. That is not fair to immigrants, to their families, or to the employers that want to hire them.
We want to increase the number of newcomers coming to Canada. We want to get families reunited faster. We want to get skilled workers here sooner. With the Liberals' support of our budget, we will get the job done.
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Liberal
Colleen Beaumier Brampton West, ON
Mr. Speaker, in spite of the rhetoric, 75 additional immigration cases have been added to the backlog under the government's watch. Its solution? Close the doors to Canada. The government--
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
An hon. member
Seventy-five thousand.
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Peter Milliken
Order. Order. I cannot hear a word.
The hon. member for Brampton West has the floor. We will have some order, please.
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Colleen Beaumier Brampton West, ON
Mr. Speaker, 750,000 additional immigration cases have been added to the backlog under the government's watch. Its solution? Close the doors to immigration.
The government has no long term plan or vision for immigration at this time when we desperately need one. Why is this minister cutting corners? Why does she not find a real solution? Why does she refuse to fight for the necessary funds to clear up the backlog?
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Haldimand—Norfolk
Ontario
Conservative
Diane Finley Minister of Citizenship and Immigration
Mr. Speaker, I am glad that finally some Liberals actually want to do something positive for immigrants. It was they who brought in the head tax on immigrants. We cut it. They voted against it.
Not only are we doing more for immigrants, we are doing it better. Family reunification cases are getting done 20% to 40% faster than under the previous government. Immigration is important to this country. That is why, unlike the Liberals, we are getting the job done.
Science and Technology
Oral Questions
March 13th, 2008 / 2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Scott Brison Kings—Hants, NS
Mr. Speaker, the RADARSAT-2 satellite was developed to strengthen Canada's sovereignty.
At committee today, the industry minister would not answer the following question, and Canadians deserve to know: Will the government guarantee that if MDA is sold to the Americans, the RADARSAT-2 satellite technology, developed by Canadians with Canadian tax dollars, will not be used against Canada's national interest to attack Canada's sovereignty?
Science and Technology
Oral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Calgary Centre-North
Alberta
Conservative
Jim Prentice Minister of Industry
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member opposite knows full well that I did attend extensively before the committee today. We discussed this at some length. He knows full that there is an Investment Canada review which is under way, for which I am responsible as the minister.
I indicated clearly to committee that I will fulfill to the letter my responsibilities in law under the Investment Canada process. There are confidentiality requirements that relate to disclosures that happen in the context of that process, but I intend in every respect to protect the interests of Canadian taxpayers.
