Debates of April 27th, 2010
House of Commons Hansard #34 of the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was discrimination}.
Topics
- Question Period
- Committees of the House
- Bill C-3--Gender Equity in Indian Registration Act
- New Brunswick 4-H Communications Competition
- Menuhin International Competition
- Justice
- Public Safety Officer Compensation Fund
- Firefighters
- Friends of Mohamed
- Audrey Paterson
- Normand Roussy
- Quebec's Forest Economies
- Official Languages
- Automotive Industry
- Public Education
- Firearms Registry
- 2010 UQAM Awards
- Yukon Mine Accident
- Leader of the Liberal Party of Canada
- International Co-operation
- Ethics
- International Co-operation
- Lobbying
- International Co-operation
- Citizenship and Immigration
- Forestry Industry
- Firearms Registry
- Ethics
- Forestry Industry
- Agriculture and Agri-Food
- Oil and Gas Industry
- Employment Insurance
- Automotive Industry
- Afghanistan
- Securities
- Status of Women
- Democratic Reform
- Afghanistan
- Broadband Canada Program
- Industry
- Presence in Gallery
- Privilege
- Message from the Senate
- Balanced Refugee Reform Act
- Business of the House
- Quebec Bridge
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Jaffer's actions came to light for one reason: the Minister of the Environment and other ministers exercised transparency. They reported these activities to the authorities and we are determined to hold people responsible when they do not comply with the laws passed by our government.
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Bloc
Carole Freeman Châteauguay—Saint-Constant, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Chronicle Herald is reporting that Rahim Jaffer and the former minister for the status of women took advantage of a government trip to take a side trip to a resort in Belize, against the advice of officials, for some unofficial business of their own.
Can the Prime Minister tell us whether his ex-minister took advantage of a government trip to Belize to deal with personal interests?
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
John Baird Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, let us be very clear. It was this government that brought in the Federal Accountability Act and increased accountability in Ottawa. We put in place an independent Lobbying Commissioner to make these types of determinations. We now have an independent Ethics Commissioner who can make these types of determinations.
If my colleague in the Bloc has any evidence that any laws were broken, she should forward that evidence to the relevant authorities immediately and follow the example of the Prime Minister.
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:20 p.m.
Bloc
Carole Freeman Châteauguay—Saint-Constant, QC
Mr. Speaker, in July 2008, Rahim Jaffer took part in a government trip to Belize with his wife, the former minister for the status of women. According to a private detective, the Conservative couple allegedly had dummy companies registered for them during that trip in order to avoid paying taxes to Revenue Canada.
Has the Prime Minister verified whether Rahim Jaffer had private meetings to promote the financial interests of the Conservative couple outside his wife's official activities in Belize?
Ethics
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
John Baird Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, I want to say this for the member opposite. When serious allegations were brought forward to the Prime Minister's attention he acted immediately and acted ethically. He forwarded all of that information over to the independent Ethics Commissioner and to the Royal Canadian Mounted Police so they could make a determination as to the facts. That was the ethical thing to do and an important thing to do.
If the member opposite has any evidence with respect to any unethical behaviour, she should follow the example of the government and do the right thing and forward it.
International Co-operation
Oral Questions
April 27th, 2010 / 2:25 p.m.
NDP
Jack Layton Toronto—Danforth, ON
Mr. Speaker, the maternal and child health initiative would be laudable except for one thing. Improving women's health, yes; reducing mortality of children, absolutely. The problem here is that we see the imposition of the Conservative morality agenda, and we say no way to that.
Despite the assurances of the Prime Minister to the contrary, through the voice of the parliamentary secretary in this House just yesterday, the Conservatives decided to reopen the debate on abortion.
Why is the Prime Minister trying to reopen the debate on abortion?
International Co-operation
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, once again, it was the opposition that decided to have Parliament vote on this issue and Parliament's decision was clear. The government's policy respects, not just the decision of Parliament but also the definitions used by the World Health Organization and many other countries in the G8 and around the world.
We understand that other governments and other taxpayers may do something different but we want to ensure our funds are used to save the lives of women and children and are used on the many things that are available to us that, frankly, do not divide the Canadian population.
International Co-operation
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
NDP
Jack Layton Toronto—Danforth, ON
Mr. Speaker, exhibiting stubbornness to fund safe and legal abortions overseas is a major step backward and it puts us on a very dangerous path, because it puts ideology to the forefront.
George Bush's Mexico City policy, for example, known as the gag rule, not only barred abortions but also resulted in funding being cut to important global NGOs like Planned Parenthood that saved the lives of women and children.
Is this the track we will see next? Will we see the cutting of funding by the government to organization that do this kind of good work internationally?
International Co-operation
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
Calgary Southwest
Alberta
Conservative
Stephen Harper Prime Minister
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of International Cooperation has been very clear. The government has a wide range of initiatives that it will be funding under its maternal and child health initiative. Frankly, there is not enough money to do all the things we want to do, even in those areas. We will concentrate our efforts on areas where the Canadian people are united and want to see progress.
International Co-operation
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
NDP
Jack Layton Toronto—Danforth, ON
Mr. Speaker, I have another example of Conservative hypocrisy.
Even as they cut funding for abortion in Africa for ideological reasons, now they are preparing to deport a pregnant, diabetic Guinean woman against the advice of her doctors.
Why does the government want to deport Sayon Camara, the wife of a Canadian citizen, during her high-risk pregnancy?
Is that what it means to protect maternal health?
International Co-operation
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
Provencher
Manitoba
Conservative
Vic Toews Minister of Public Safety
Mr. Speaker, I understand that individual's lawyer has filed an application with the federal court and the court has granted a stay.
I would indicate to the member that the CBSA carries out the orders of the tribunals and the courts and respects the rule of law.
Lobbying
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
Liberal
Anita Neville Winnipeg South Centre, MB
Mr. Speaker, parliamentary secretaries are not covered by the same lobbying rules as ministers or their staff. The Prime Minister's guide for ministers says, “Only ministers are responsible for the direction of public servants and departmental resources”.
GPG's dragon power proposal was reviewed by the infrastructure minister's department. Will the minister tell us who wrote on that proposal, “From Rahim, submit to department”, because we know it should not have been written by the minister's PS.
Lobbying
Oral Questions
2:25 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
John Baird Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, let me be very clear. The green infrastructure program is administered by my department. I am responsible for it at the beginning of the day and at the end of the day. I asked my parliamentary secretary to assist me in my responsibilities.
There are strict eligibility criteria with respect to this fund and all assessments on this project are done by an independent public service.
If the member opposite has any allegations of impropriety that she would like to make, she should follow the example of the government and make them to the relevant authorities.
Lobbying
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Liberal
Anita Neville Winnipeg South Centre, MB
Mr. Speaker, I will repeat. Who wrote it?
It was the Minister of Infrastructure who crafted the flawed Federal Accountability Act, but now he is abandoning the Prime Minister's election promise to require ministers and senior government officials to record their contacts with lobbyists.
He knew better than anyone that a loophole existed for parliamentary secretaries. He created it. The Conservatives' culture of deceit must end.
Will the government agree to seek unanimous approval of the House to submit PS's to the full discipline of the Lobbying Act?
Lobbying
Oral Questions
2:30 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
John Baird Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, we expect all lobbyists to follow the law. We expect them all to follow the rules. We have put in place an independent Lobbying Commissioner to make determinations on how these rules are followed.
If the member opposite has any evidence of anything that has been done that is untoward, she should immediately forward it to the Lobbying Commissioner and have the courage of her convictions to do that.
