Debates of Feb. 14th, 2012
House of Commons Hansard #80 of the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was financial.
Topics
- Question Period
- Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act
- Income Tax Act
- Public Service Commission
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Financial System Review Act
- Points of Order
- Financial System Review Act
- Black Communities in Quebec
- Valentine's Day
- Public Transit
- Agriculture
- Ocean Ranger
- Firearms Registry
- Bathurst Regional Hospital
- I Love Me Club
- Scouting
- Poverty
- International Trade
- Ocean Ranger
- Canada-U.S. Relations
- Vaclav Havel
- Member for Papineau
- Government Appointments
- Firearms Registry
- Public Safety
- Government Priorities
- Pensions
- National Defence
- Public Safety
- Aboriginal Affairs
- National Defence
- Public Safety
- Natural Resources
- Citizenship and Immigration
- Veterans Affairs
- International Trade
- Justice
- Infrastructure
- Air Canada
- Aboriginal Affairs
- Homelessness
- Foreign Affairs
- Canada Post
- Foreign Investment
- Presence in Gallery
- Point of Order
- Financial System Review Act
- Canadian Human Rights Act
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Conservative
The Speaker Andrew Scheer
Order. I am sure the minister appreciates the help answering the question, but he has the floor and members should be silent while he is giving his answer.
The hon. Minister of Natural Resources.
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Conservative
Joe Oliver Eglinton—Lawrence, ON
Mr. Speaker, the fuel quality directive is an unscientific attempt to stigmatize the oil sands and is trying to subject Canadian interests to discriminatory treatment , which we oppose, and increasingly other European--
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Conservative
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
NDP
Kennedy Stewart Burnaby—Douglas, BC
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives came back from China congratulating themselves for selling off Canadian raw resources. With the Enbridge CEO in tow, they told the Chinese not to worry about Canadian opposition because they will just ignore it. The northern gateway will ship 21,000 refining jobs out of Canada for two pandas.
Would the minister confirm that according to his government's calculation, one panda is worth more than 10,000 Canadian jobs?
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Eglinton—Lawrence
Ontario
Conservative
Joe Oliver Minister of Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, the trip to China was extraordinarily successful in building a relationship with the largest consumer of energy in the world, a country which, 25 years from now, will represent one-quarter of energy demand globally.
We are going to have an opportunity to sell our resources and exchange investment opportunities in both countries, which will generate hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions--
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Conservative
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
NDP
Claude Gravelle Nickel Belt, ON
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives are not listening to the public. They prefer to conspire with oil lobbyists on building new pipelines. Canadians and the first nations do not want new pipelines. Experts have said in committee that this approach was harmful to Canadian refineries, which have lost 10,000 jobs since 1989.
Why give priority to the interests of the major oil companies, but refuse to listen to the concerns of Canadians?
Natural Resources
Oral Questions
February 14th, 2012 / 2:40 p.m.
Eglinton—Lawrence
Ontario
Conservative
Joe Oliver Minister of Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, it seems the NDP wants to build refineries but does not want to build pipelines, so the oil would presumably just stay there. That is a plan, I guess.
Greenhouse gas emissions from the oil sands represent one one-thousandth of global emissions. We should be proud of the fact that greenhouse gas emissions have been reduced by 30% over the last 10 years.
Canada is doing the right thing and is proceeding responsibly.
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Conservative
Wladyslaw Lizon Mississauga East—Cooksville, ON
Mr. Speaker, I was shocked to learn that last year alone, Canada received 5,800 refugee applications not from Africa or Asia, but from the European Union. Almost all of these claims were found to be bogus. These bogus claims cost taxpayers almost $170 million in just one year.
The increasing number of unfounded refugee claims is causing a lot of concern among Canadians, including my constituents in Mississauga East--Cooksville.
Could the minister inform the House of what the government is doing to address this important issue?
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Calgary Southeast
Alberta
Conservative
Jason Kenney Minister of Citizenship
Mr. Speaker, it is peculiar that Canada is receiving more asylum claims from the democratic rights-respecting European Union than from Africa or Asia.
Nearly all of these claims are determined to be unfounded. Over 95% of these claimants withdraw or abandon their own claims. The evidence before us suggests that most of these claimants are taking maximum advantage of generous Canadian social benefits, such as provincial welfare and welfare federal cash transfers. There has been a criminal prosecution into human trafficking and welfare fraud in Hamilton.
We must take action to protect the integrity of Canada's immigration system and to avoid our generosity being--
Citizenship and Immigration
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Conservative
Veterans Affairs
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
NDP
Peter Stoffer Sackville—Eastern Shore, NS
Mr. Speaker, last year Jennifer Stoddart, the Privacy Commissioner, said department officials at Veterans Affairs broke the law and breached the Privacy Act with respect to Sean Bruyea and other veterans. We were told by the Conservatives that no longer happens, that it cannot happen again.
In the news the other day we found out that the private information of Harold Leduc, a 22 year veteran who serves on the Veterans Review and Appeal Board, was recently scattered throughout the department, denigrating him in front of all of his peers. How the government could do that to veterans is beyond me.
Will the Minister of Veterans Affairs stand in his place, look into the camera, and apologize to Harold Leduc? Will the Prime Minister now call for a judicial inquiry into--
Veterans Affairs
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Conservative
Veterans Affairs
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Lévis—Bellechasse
Québec
Conservative
Steven Blaney Minister of Veterans Affairs
Mr. Speaker, as a government we care every day of the year for our veterans and we will continue to do so. Any show of disrespect toward our veterans is unacceptable and actually shocking.
As the member knows, the Veterans Review and Appeal Board is an arm's-length organization. When privacy breaches occur, I expect corrective measures to be put in place according to the most stringent policy.
Let me be clear. When the board renders decisions which affect our veterans' lives, fairness and equity are and have to remain the sole criteria.
