An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and the Canada Labour Code

This bill is from the 38th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in November 2005.

Sponsor

Gerry Ritz  Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Nov. 4, 2005
(This bill did not become law.)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-437s:

C-437 (2019) Addressing the Continuing Victimization of Homicide Victims' Families Act
C-437 (2013) An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 (prohibition against the transportation of oil by oil tankers on Canada’s Pacific North Coast)
C-437 (2012) An Act to amend the Canada Shipping Act, 2001 (prohibition against the transportation of oil by oil tankers on Canada’s Pacific North Coast)
C-437 (2010) Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act
C-437 (2009) An Act to Amend the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Act (labour relations)
C-437 (2007) Canadian Sustainability Act

Employment Insurance ActRoutine Proceedings

November 4th, 2005 / 12:10 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Gerry Ritz Conservative Battlefords—Lloydminster, SK

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-437, An Act to amend the Employment Insurance Act and the Canada Labour Code.

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to table this bill today. It is a short piece of legislation that would open the definition of family member within the HRD code to include siblings and in-laws, something which was certainly an oversight by the government.

There has been a lot of talk about it. The government is paying some lip service. There have been motions by other members in the House. I am certain that this is the type of bill someone will grab and run with and that it will receive unanimous consent when we finally speak to it.

The Liberals originally announced $200 million to address this shortfall. They were not able to spend any more than close to $8 million, so there is certainly room to expand that definition.

We look forward to debate on the bill. The genesis of the bill is from a woman named Heather Chisholm in my riding. She is a seniors worker and understands the need for this type of legislation.

I look forward to speaking to the bill in the future.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)