Bill C-274 (Historical)

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (Order of prohibition)

This bill is from the 37th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2002.

Sponsor

Peter MacKay  Progressive Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Feb. 21, 2001
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-339 (38th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)
C-290 (37th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)
C-290 (37th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (order of prohibition)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-274s:

C-274 (2022) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (detention in custody)
C-274 (2021) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal interest rate)
C-274 (2016) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (transfer of small business or family farm or fishing corporation)
C-274 (2013) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (animal cruelty)

Criminal CodeRoutine Proceedings

February 21st, 2001 / 3:15 p.m.


See context

Progressive Conservative

Peter MacKay Progressive Conservative Pictou—Antigonish—Guysborough, NS

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-274, an act to amend the Criminal Code (Order of prohibition).

Mr. Speaker, I have a bill that I think has a little more substance than the last one.

It refers to a section of the criminal code, currently section 161, which deals with an offender convicted of a sexual offence. The enactment would permit the court to make a prohibition for the offender from being in a dwelling house where the offender knows or ought to know that a person under the age of 14 is present without being in the custody or control of a person also of that age.

In essence what the bill will do is allow judges to currently expand the umbrella of protection when putting in place prohibition orders for those who have been convicted of a sexual offence.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)