An Act to amend the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act

This bill is from the 39th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in October 2007.

Sponsor

Chuck Strahl  Conservative

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment extends Part I of the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act to a wider range of agricultural products and makes benefits under that Part more accessible to producers throughout the production cycle of agricultural products.

Similar bills

C-69 (38th Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Agricultural Marketing Programs Act

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-15s:

C-15 (2022) Law Appropriation Act No. 5, 2021-22
C-15 (2020) Law United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act
C-15 (2020) Law Canada Emergency Student Benefit Act
C-15 (2016) Law Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 1.
C-15 (2013) Law Northwest Territories Devolution Act
C-15 (2011) Law Strengthening Military Justice in the Defence of Canada Act

Business of the HousePrivate Members' Business

June 5th, 2006 / 12:10 p.m.


See context

Liberal

Ralph Goodale Liberal Wascana, SK

Mr. Speaker, if I could seek further clarification from the chief government whip, this matter might be dealt with expeditiously. I believe I heard him say that there is agreement that, one way or another, Bill C-15 will be dealt with by the end of this day. I would prefer it be 2 o'clock, but it seems we have common agreement that, as somebody once said, come hell or high water, this legislation will be dealt with and sent off to the Senate so farmers can get their money by the end of the day.

The Senate is not sitting this afternoon, so we are not inconveniencing it by waiting until the end of the day as opposed to 2 o'clock. If we have common agreement in the House that this matter will one way or another be on its way to the Senate by the end of the day today, why do we not put that in the form of a House order, so we are all sure and clear of the result and just get it done?

Business of the HousePrivate Members' Business

June 5th, 2006 / 12:10 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Jay Hill Conservative Prince George—Peace River, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I want to point out that the government certainly intends to call Bill C-15. We intend to deal with it in an expeditious manner. I thought we had an agreement among all four parties in the House to deal with it at a later time this very same day. That is certainly our intention. We only said no to this particular motion because we thought that was our understanding.