This bill is from the 39th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in October 2007.
James Rajotte Conservative
Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)
Second reading (Senate), as of May 9, 2007
(This bill did not become law.)
All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.
Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-299s:
The House resumed from February 28 consideration of Bill C-299, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Canada Evidence Act and the Competition Act (personal information obtained by fraud), as reported (with amendment) from the committee.
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Acting Speaker Royal Galipeau
There being no motions at report stage, the House will now proceed, without debate, to the putting of the question of the motion to concur in at report stage
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Acting Speaker Royal Galipeau
The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Acting Speaker Royal Galipeau
In my opinion the nays have it.
And five or more members having rise:
Pursuant to Standing Order 98, the recorded division stands deferred until Wednesday, May 2, 2007, immediately before the time provided for private members' business.
Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. If I have been following what has just transpired in the last few moments correctly, according to procedure we have to go immediately to adjournment.
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Acting Speaker Royal Galipeau
I was tempted to do something that I would not like to do, which is to suspend until the hour of adjournment.
The hon. member for Edmonton—Sherwood Park is rising on a point of order.
Ken Epp Conservative Edmonton—Sherwood Park, AB
Mr. Speaker, while we regret very much that the members opposite did not recognize that this was report stage of a private member's bill and we could have proceeded to debate on third reading, I guess we have to forgive the Liberals for not being on the bit today.
Therefore, I would ask, Mr. Speaker, that you seek unanimous consent now to see the clock as 6:30 p.m., so that we can go forward to adjournment proceedings.
Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Mr. Speaker, on the same point of order, with all due respect to my learned colleague from Edmonton—Sherwood Park, I believe if we follow correct House procedures, we do not need unanimous consent to see the clock as 6:30 p.m., we immediately go to adjournment.
Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business
The Acting Speaker Royal Galipeau
I appreciate the contributions of both hon. members and of course the hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons is right.
It was with pleasure that I listened to the hon. member for Edmonton—Sherwood Park, especially that in order to achieve our aim we needed to have the specific members involved in the House, and I know that they are in the House now.
