The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

National Blood Donor Week Act

An Act respecting a National Blood Donor Week

This bill is from the 39th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in October 2007.

Status

In committee (House), as of June 8, 2007
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

S-220 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) Law An Act respecting a National Blood Donor Week
S-29 (38th Parliament, 1st session) National Blood Donor Week Act

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other S-214s:

S-214 (2025) An Act to amend the Special Economic Measures Act (disposal of foreign state assets)
S-214 (2021) Law International Mother Language Day Act
S-214 (2020) Constitution Act, 2020 (property qualifications of Senators)
S-214 (2020) An Act to amend the Criminal Records Act, to make consequential amendments to other Acts and to repeal a regulation

National Blood Donor Week ActRoutine Proceedings

December 5th, 2007 / 3:25 p.m.


See context

Liberal

Navdeep Bains Liberal Mississauga—Brampton South, ON

moved that Bill S-220, An Act respecting a National Blood Donor Week, be read the first time.

Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to reintroduce and once again sponsor Bill S-220, An Act respecting a National Blood Donor Week. When I introduced the bill in the previous Parliament, all parties joined me in supporting this worthy initiative.

Canada relies on voluntary donors to provide blood and blood products required to treat patients in a variety of situations. Blood donors save lives every day, yet, sadly, there are not enough to meet the needs of our health care system. The purpose of the bill is to recognize and encourage blood donors who choose to share the gift of life with their fellow Canadians. I trust all parties will continue to support this valuable initiative.

Therefore, pursuant to Standing Order 86.2, I wish to inform the Speaker that the bill is in the same form as Bill S-214, which was before the House in the first session and I ask that the bill be reinstated.

(Motion agreed to and bill read the first time)

Suspension of Certain Standing Orders--Bill C-52Business of the HousePrivate Members' Business

June 8th, 2007 / 2:30 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Jay Hill Conservative Prince George—Peace River, BC

Mr. Speaker, that was quite a spiel. I guess one might call that a tawdry spiel.

I could go on for 10 minutes, as other colleagues have, on this particular use of Standing Order 53, but I will not, because if I do, then other people, I am sure, will want to add their words of wisdom on the appropriateness, urgency, et cetera, of the use of this standing order. I could certainly defend what I believe is its urgent nature, but I will not.

What I will do instead, Mr. Speaker, given the hour, is ask you to seek unanimous consent of the chamber to put your question now and do the head count that is necessary. Secondly, Mr. Speaker, I believe that immediately thereafter if you sought it you would find unanimous consent to return to Bill S-214, which was being debated when I interrupted the proceedings with my point of order. If you seek it, I think you would find unanimous consent to pass it at second reading.