Bill C-466 (Historical)

An Act to amend the National Defence Act (definition of "employer") and to make a consequential amendment to another Act

This bill is from the 39th Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in September 2008.

Sponsor

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Oct. 23, 2007
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment amends the definition of “employer” in section 285.01 of the National Defence Act and fixes the day on which sections 285.01 to 285.13 of that Act come into force.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-466s:

C-466 (2019) An Act to amend the Corrections and Conditional Release Act (disclosure of information to victims)

C-466 (2013) Task Force for the Payments System Review Recommendations Act

C-466 (2012) Task Force for the Payments System Review Recommendations Act

C-466 (2010) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (transportation benefits)

C-466 (2009) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (transportation benefits)

C-466 (2004) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (interference with a peace officer's equipment)

1^st reading

National Defence ActRoutine Proceedings

October 23rd, 2007 / 10:05 a.m.

NDP

Dawn Black NDP New Westminster—Coquitlam, BC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-466, An Act to amend the National Defence Act (definition of “employer”) and to make a consequential amendment to another Act.

Mr. Speaker, we have a rather ridiculous situation right now where members serving in the Canadian reserves do not have a guarantee of job protection when they serve on a mission for Canada. My bill aims to rectify that.

When reservists serve on a Canadian mission, they should have a guarantee that their job will be protected and be there for them when they return to Canada.

Currently, three provinces have elected legislation, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Nova Scotia, to protect jobs that are covered under provincial jurisdiction. My bill would change the federal legislation so that people who work in jobs under federal legislation would be covered.

Actually, the House proposed some changes in 1998 but, under successive Liberal and Conservative governments, those changes have never been implemented.

I push the government to ensure that our reservists who serve Canada have a guarantee that their jobs will be protected when they come back to this country.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)