An Act to amend the Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) Act

This bill is from the 40th Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in December 2009.

Sponsor

Chuck Strahl  Conservative

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment amends the Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) Act, in respect of Cree bands and Category IA land,
(a) to provide the Cree Regional Authority with additional responsibilities and powers, including by-law making powers; and
(b) to recognize the Crees of Oujé-Bougoumou as a separate band and a local government under that Act.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-28s:

C-28 (2022) Law An Act to amend the Criminal Code (self-induced extreme intoxication)
C-28 (2021) Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada Act
C-28 (2016) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (victim surcharge)
C-28 (2014) Law Appropriation Act No. 5, 2013-14
C-28 (2011) Law Financial Literacy Leader Act
C-28 (2010) Law An Act to promote the efficiency and adaptability of the Canadian economy by regulating certain activities that discourage reliance on electronic means of carrying out commercial activities, and to amend the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission Act, the Competition Act, the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act and the Telecommunications Act

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:50 p.m.

Liberal

Larry Bagnell Liberal Yukon, YT

Mr. Speaker, the member made the excellent point that the apology was not really the end. It is like signing a land claim; it is actually the beginning. It is the beginning of recognition by every member of Parliament that there was a grievous mistake and grievous ramifications and effects not only to generation that went through it but to their progeny.

If we recognized that problem in the great ceremony we had here, then we also need to recognize that we need to deal with that problem. For instance, we cannot allow the healing fund to expire as if everyone is healed just because the apology was made. We cannot allow the reconciliation process, when it gets started, to be a sounding board and not have any action. The purpose of the reconciliation hearings will be to give us an idea of not only the effect it has had on people but what their ideas are of what we can do to mitigate those effects and help them get on with life.

The member certainly would have been moved by the ceremony we had in my riding a couple of weeks ago where they tore down an old residential school. What moved me was that virtually all the speakers talked about their chance for a new beginning, that, as the member said, if we give them the tools and the resources then they can leave the hurt in the past. It will never be gone but they can now get on with a new life. They are looking forward a new bright future, like all Canadians should have.

If we put that commitment into it, I think all of our citizens will move ahead to the benefit of all of us.

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:50 p.m.

Liberal

Paul Szabo Liberal Mississauga South, ON

Mr. Speaker, I congratulate the member for Yukon, who I have known very well for many years, on the exceptional work he does on behalf of first nations. The member is always here and yet always gets home to see his family in Yukon on the weekends. I do not know where he gets his energy but it is much appreciated by the House that he is here to help with this important legislation.

My question for the member has to do with the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. My understanding is that Canada is not a signatory. This came up in our discussions on Bill C-8 on matrimonial real property. The declaration includes such items as the rights of indigenous peoples to self-determination; to maintain and strengthen their distinct political, legal, economic, social and cultural institutions; to not be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture; and, without discrimination, to the improvement of their economic and social conditions. The list goes on.

Those, to me, seem to be values that Canada should embrace and they should be reflective in legislation that we bring before this place as it relates to our first nations.

Does the member know why Canada is not a signatory to the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and does he know whether or not the bill before us now, at least in spirit, reflects the principles underlying that declaration?

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:50 p.m.

Liberal

Larry Bagnell Liberal Yukon, YT

Mr. Speaker, the member makes a very good point. I will not speculate on the technical reasons that the government has not signed it, but he talked about the values that are there.

As I said earlier in my response to the member for Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca, if one follows those values that occur in the self-government and land claims agreements in the modern treaties, such as the social values and the ability of first nations, maybe there is another answer. Maybe they have ways of running their own local justice system, as they have successfully for thousands of years. Maybe they have a different way of self-determination. Maybe they have different matrimonial property rights. Maybe they have a different way of looking at governance, where everything is not the individual, but one has collective rights.

One of their biggest arguments against Bill C-8 as it is written is that it does not recognize collective rights as a way of governing another people. The United Nations declaration points out all these points. As the member for Esquimalt—Juan de Fuca said, our pilot projects in Canada in the modern treaties that got certain first nations away from the Indian Act have been very successful.

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:55 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Andrew Scheer

Is the House ready for the question?

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:55 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Andrew Scheer

The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:55 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Cree-Naskapi (of Quebec) ActGovernment Orders

May 26th, 2009 / 4:55 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Andrew Scheer

(Motion agreed to, bill read the third time and passed)