An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act (Internet neutrality)

This bill is from the 40th Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in December 2009.

Sponsor

Charlie Angus  NDP

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of May 29, 2009
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-398 (40th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act (Internet neutrality)
C-552 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act (Internet Neutrality)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-398s:

C-398 (2024) An Act to amend the National Housing Strategy Act
C-398 (2018) An Act to amend the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (medical inadmissibility — excessive demand)
C-398 (2012) An Act to amend the Patent Act (drugs for international humanitarian purposes)
C-398 (2007) Canada Post-Secondary Education Act
C-398 (2007) Canada Post-Secondary Education Act

Telecommunications ActRoutine Proceedings

May 29th, 2009 / 12:10 p.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-398, An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act (Internet neutrality).

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise today and, with the help of my colleague from Burnaby—New Westminster, introduce this bill that would change section 36 of the Telecommunications Act.

It is very important as Canadians that we maintain the innovation agenda of the Internet. We have known that the importance of the Internet has been based on the principle that all content that moves along the pipes moves at the same rate and that the innovators and the consumers at the end of the pipes are the ones in charge of deciding what content has priority, not the telecom giants. We need to ensure that we are not dealing with the efforts of throttling, interference of traffic on the Internet.

This is a very simple and straightforward bill that would ensure that the telecommunication service provider shall not engage in network management practices that favour, degrade or prioritize any content, application or service transmitted over a broadband network based on its source, ownership, destination or type.

There are, of course, provisions for proper management of the Internet traffic but I think my colleagues will agree that if we are to maintain a 21st century innovation economy, the principle of net neutrality must be protected.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)