Canada Water Preservation Act

An Act respecting the preservation of Canada’s water resources

This bill is from the 40th Parliament, 3rd session, which ended in March 2011.

Sponsor

Francis Scarpaleggia  Liberal

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of March 3, 2010
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment prohibits the removal of water in bulk from major drainage basins in Canada.

Similar bills

C-267 (41st Parliament, 1st session) Canada Water Preservation Act
C-228 (40th Parliament, 2nd session) Canada Water Preservation Act
C-228 (40th Parliament, 1st session) Canada Water Preservation Act
C-535 (39th Parliament, 2nd session) Canada Water Preservation Act

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-228s:

C-228 (2022) Law Pension Protection Act
C-228 (2021) Law Reduction of Recidivism Framework Act
C-228 (2020) Reduction of Recidivism Framework Act
C-228 (2016) An Act to amend the Fisheries Act (closed containment aquaculture)
C-228 (2013) National Appreciation Day Act
C-228 (2011) National Appreciation Day Act

Foreign AffairsOral Questions

June 3rd, 2010 / 2:50 p.m.


See context

Liberal

Francis Scarpaleggia Liberal Lac-Saint-Louis, QC

Mr. Speaker, the government is winging it on an issue that is vital to Canada's economy and to the survival of our ecosystems. The Munk School of Global Affairs just informed the Minister of Foreign Affairs that his Bill C-26 is ineffective. This bill claimed to stop exports of water to the United States, but in reality, the bill is just a sieve.

Why not simply pass my Bill C-228, which reflects the recommendations from the Munk School, and which would save the government additional drafting costs?

Translated