Bill C-625 (Historical)
An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (amphetamines)
This bill was last introduced in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session, which ended in March 2011.
Libby Davies NDP
Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)
Introduced, as of Feb. 11, 2011
(This bill did not become law.)
This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament often publishes better independent summaries.
This enactment amends the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to transfer amphetamines from Schedule III to Schedule I, so that the punishment is more severe for offences involving amphetamines.
Controlled Drugs and Substances Act
February 11th, 2011 / 12:05 p.m.
Libby Davies Vancouver East, BC
moved for leave to introduce Bill C-625, An Act to amend the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act (amphetamines).
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise in the House today to introduce this bill. This bill has come about as a result of the original Bill C-15 that came through the House on the mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes. This was a bill that the NDP fought against because we thought it was a very bad bill. We pointed out over and over again that there was no evidence to show that mandatory minimum sentences for drug crimes worked.
As we know, that bill eventually passed through the House of Commons and went to the Senate. Then it was eliminated because of prorogation. The bill was reintroduced in the Senate and is actually now back in the House as Bill S-10 , and I am very glad the NDP will remain in opposition to that bill.
However, in debating the bill, we did agree that there was one element of the bill that we thought was important, and that was dealing with amphetamines and how they were listed in the various schedules under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
I made a commitment during the debate that we had on the original bill that I would move a private member's bill to transfer amphetamines from schedule 3 under the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act to schedule 1 under the same act, so the punishment would be more severe for offences involving amphetamines.
That was something we actually did support in the original bill, so I am pleased to rise in the House today to bring this forward, to make it clear that we did support that element, and we agree that those drugs should be moved from schedule 3 to schedule 1.
(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)