Protecting Canada's Seniors Act

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (elder abuse)

This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2013.

Sponsor

Rob Nicholson  Conservative

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to add vulnerability due to age as an aggravating circumstance for sentencing purposes.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-36s:

C-36 (2022) Law Appropriation Act No. 4, 2022-23
C-36 (2021) An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act and to make related amendments to another Act (hate propaganda, hate crimes and hate speech)
C-36 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Statistics Act
C-36 (2014) Law Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act

Votes

Nov. 6, 2012 Passed That the Bill be now read a third time and do pass.
June 20, 2012 Passed That the Bill be now read a second time and referred to the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:20 p.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my hon. colleague for the excellent question.

I want to say to the folks back home, “Get used to it. This is what it is going to look like in 2015 when we have finally gotten rid of the Conservatives. They have abandoned the field to discussion.”

The Conservatives cannot get up and make misrepresentations, so they really do not know what else to talk about. We could be talking about, I suppose, flying limousines for the Prime Minister, hanging out at the Taj Mahal. We could talk about their priorities of taking $50 million in border infrastructure money and blowing it in a slush fund. That is their idea of priorities.

We could talk about the F-35. Well, we are not supposed to talk about the F-35 because they are not sure if it is the F-35 anymore. They were going to have a $10 billion overrun on 65 planes, and then they were going to try to keep it from the Canadian people.

Meanwhile the Conservatives are not interested in the real priorities, for example, getting the transfers for home care for seniors. The hon. Jack Layton, before he died, in the election of 2011, made his one commitment to seniors, that we would pass a bill to get every senior in this country out of poverty. The cost was $700 million. That might seem like a lot, but that is probably not even the cost of replacing the engine in one of the F-35s, because I hear they are not coming with engines.

It is a question of choices. This is what politics is about. It is a question of choices. We have a government that uses its choices again and again to blow money on its friends, to give breaks, to misrepresent facts, to use its time in the House of Commons, not to discuss important issues but to try to misrepresent and fool the Canadian people.

The New Democratic Party has been talking about these issues consistently and coherently. Canadians know that when we are talking about the issues of senior citizens, it is not just that we are going to bring in a mandatory minimum sentence and change the Criminal Code.

We have to have a coherent vision to ensure that, not only can we address criminalization against seniors and their victimization, but that we will have a strategy for fraud that is proactive. We will have a strategy for home care. We will actually have the transfers to the provinces, to ensure the Canadian health system remains something that we can all be proud of, and that it does not continue to deteriorate, as has happened all too often across this country.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

Liberal

Scott Brison Liberal Kings—Hants, NS

Mr. Speaker, I have a question for the member about the obvious inconsistency in the NDP platform. It is against elder abuse, and yet at the same time it wants to abolish the Senate. However, I am not going to go there.

On a more serious note, would the hon. member agree with me that making the caregiver tax credit fully refundable, such that it would help low-income families, would go a long way to helping those families and a lot of Canadians who are struggling with loved ones and seniors who need help at home?

Second, would the hon. member agree that Canada should develop a more robust national Alzheimer's strategy? We are one of the few countries in the industrialized world without a strong national strategy around Alzheimer's.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Mr. Speaker, I welcome my colleague from the Liberals to this discussion. It is now between us and the Liberals to discuss these important issues. The Conservatives have all gone to sleep over there.

We need a national Alzheimer's strategy. It is very important. Instead of Conservatives wasting time with attack ads and misrepresentations, I would invite them to actually get serious about some of these issues for a change.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

Resuming debate. Is the House ready for the question?

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

All those opposed will please say nay.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker

In my opinion the yeas have it.

And five or more members having risen:

Call in the members.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

Conservative

Gordon O'Connor Conservative Carleton—Mississippi Mills, ON

Mr. Speaker, I ask that you defer the vote to tomorrow following government orders.

Protecting Canada's Seniors ActGovernment Orders

November 5th, 2012 / 6:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Joe Comartin

The vote will be deferred accordingly.

The House resumed from November 5 consideration of the motion that Bill C-36, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (elder abuse), be read the third time and passed.