An Act to amend the Criminal Code (personating peace officer or public officer)

This bill is from the 41st Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2013.

Sponsor

Earl Dreeshen  Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Second reading (Senate), as of June 17, 2013
(This bill did not become law.)

Similar bills

C-444 (41st Parliament, 2nd session) Law An Act to amend the Criminal Code (personating peace officer or public officer)
C-576 (40th Parliament, 3rd session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (personating peace officer)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-444s:

C-444 (2019) An Act to amend the International Boundary Waters Treaty Act (water quality)
C-444 (2010) An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and the Telecommunications Act (broadcasting and telecommunications policies)
C-444 (2009) An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and the Telecommunications Act (broadcasting and telecommunications policies)

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

June 14th, 2013 / 1:40 p.m.

Conservative

Earl Dreeshen Conservative Red Deer, AB

Mr. Speaker, I am humbled to rise today to wrap up this debate on Bill C-444, my private member's bill.

It is not often we get to work specifically on behalf of a constituent in such a significant way, by making a change to the Criminal Code of Canada. First and foremost, I want to thank the brave young woman and her mother who inspired me to table this bill. There are also many folks on the Hill I would like to thank for the support and encouragement they have extended to me along the way, as well as for the personal work they have put into our debates on this bill. This also includes my wonderful staff, here in Ottawa as well as back in Red Deer.

As I have said, this bill is about sentencing. It speaks to the need for tougher penalties for personating peace officers and public officers, and it is in line with the fundamental sentencing principle of proportionality, which is stated in section 718 of the Criminal Code. We must preserve the trust and respect that citizens have for police officers. When citizens see a police uniform, they trust the authority that comes with it. We are giving the tools that they need to deliver harsher sentences to criminals who breach this trust to cause harm.

Within the parameters of the maximum sentence for this particular offence, the decision of what sentences are appropriate will still rest with sentencing courts. We know that a number of factors come into play in a sentencing decision, such as the criminal record of the offender or the severity of harm caused to a victim.

Aggravating circumstances are just one more factor that sentencing judges are required to consider when the Crown is successful in a conviction. Sentencing achieves a number of results, and one of them is support for victims. The rights of victims need to be protected. They must know that there are serious consequences for criminals who have hurt them.

I extend my heartfelt condolences to any Canadian who has been a victim of someone maliciously personating a police officer to do further harm. I dedicate this work to those victims.

I thank my colleagues for their support. If I still have a moment, I would like to thank the following members for their contribution to debate: the Minister of Justice; the members of the Standing Committee on Justice for their thoughtful study and debate, and their support; the seconders, the members for Sault Ste. Marie and Oxford; the members who contributed their time in speaking here in the House, the members for Gatineau, Mount Royal, Montcalm, Brome—Missisquoi, Charlottetown, Beauport—Limoilou, British Columbia Southern Interior, Vaudreuil-Soulanges, Louis-Hébert, Nanaimo—Cowichan, Chambly—Borduas, Northumberland—Quinte West, Edmonton—St. Albert, Windsor—Tecumseh, and the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Justice, as well as the Associate Minister of National Defence.

There is a special symbolism of having every member present in this House stand to show their support, not just for a bill but for victims and police officers throughout this great nation.

However, because of the uncertainty that surrounds the closing days of any session, I would be proud to use this opportunity to stand on behalf of all members and to accept unanimous consent if the House so chooses.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

June 14th, 2013 / 1:40 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

Is the House ready for the question?

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

June 14th, 2013 / 1:40 p.m.

Some hon. members

Question.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

June 14th, 2013 / 1:40 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

The question is on the motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

June 14th, 2013 / 1:40 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

June 14th, 2013 / 1:40 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

(Motion agreed to, bill read the third time and passed)

Criminal CodePrivate Members' Business

June 14th, 2013 / 1:40 p.m.

The Acting Speaker Barry Devolin

It being 1:45 p.m., the House stands adjourned until next Monday at 11 a.m. pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 1:45 p.m.)