This bill was last introduced in the 41st Parliament, 2nd Session, which ended in August 2015.
Laurin Liu NDP
Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)
Defeated, as of April 22, 2015
(This bill did not become law.)
This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament often publishes better independent summaries.
This enactment amends the definition “employee” in Parts II and III of the Canada Labour Code to include persons receiving training with or without remuneration and specifies the conditions under which training without remuneration is permitted.
All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.
Intern Protection ActPrivate Members' Business
April 20th, 2015 / 11:55 a.m.
See
context
Conservative
The Acting Speaker Conservative Bruce Stanton
Does the hon. member for Hamilton East—Stoney Creek have the unanimous consent of the House to propose the motion?
Intern Protection ActPrivate Members' Business
April 20th, 2015 / 11:55 a.m.
See
context
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
Intern Protection ActPrivate Members' Business
April 20th, 2015 / 11:55 a.m.
See
context
Conservative
Brad Butt Conservative Mississauga—Streetsville, ON
Mr. Speaker, this was a complete shock to me. I was not consulted on this motion. I am glad that the NDP, I am assuming, supports the motion. I wanted to have the opportunity to speak to the motion in the House. It is my motion, after all. I would be delighted to work with the opposition parties to get this motion passed, but I feel that today I am completely caught off guard. I was not consulted in any way on this and I would like the opportunity to speak to my own motion.
Intern Protection ActPrivate Members' Business
April 20th, 2015 / 11:55 a.m.
See
context
Conservative
The Acting Speaker Conservative Bruce Stanton
I appreciate the intervention by the hon. member for Mississauga—Streetsville. The House recognizes consent was not given on the motion that the hon. member for Hamilton East—Stoney Creek was seeking.
Hon. members will know that it is somewhat common practice that if members seek the unanimous consent of the House on certain questions, it is absolutely at the House's discretion to consider those motions. As for the opportunity for the hon. member for Mississauga—Streetsville to speak to his motion, as he mentioned, I am sure that will be taken up in due course in the normal procedures that the House provides.