All those opposed will please say nay.
An Act to amend the Air Canada Public Participation Act and to provide for certain other measures
This bill was last introduced in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session, which ended in September 2019.
This bill was last introduced in the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session, which ended in September 2019.
Marc Garneau Liberal
This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.
This is from the published bill.
This enactment amends the Air Canada Public Participation Act to provide that Air Canada’s articles of continuance contain a requirement that it carry out aircraft maintenance activities in Ontario, Quebec and Manitoba and to provide for certain other measures related to that obligation.
All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.
Bill C-10--Time Allocation MotionAir Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
NDP
Some hon. members
Nay.
Bill C-10--Time Allocation MotionAir Canada Public Participation ActGovernment Orders
NDP
The Assistant Deputy Speaker NDP Carol Hughes
In my opinion the yeas have it.
And five or more members having risen:
Call in the members.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.
(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)
The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan
I declare the motion carried.
I wish to inform the House that because of the deferred recorded division and the proceedings from the time allocation motion, government orders will be extended by 40 minutes.
John Brassard Conservative Barrie—Innisfil, ON
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order on an answer given by the Minister of Immigration yesterday in the House to my question regarding the cost of $6.4 million to renovate Canadian forces bases to accommodate refugees who were never housed. The minister stated, “My colleague beside me, the Minister of National Defence, confirms there is nothing truthful in the member's comments about defence.”
The question was based on an Order Paper question, signed and tabled by the Parliamentary Secretary to the Government House Leader. Question No. 18 has already been tabled in the House. The substance of my question and the figures that were used were based on information derived from this very document.
One of two things possibly happened. Either the Minister of Immigration misunderstood the Minister of National Defence's confirmation of the information given to him, or he misled the House and Canadians.
The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan
This sounds more like debate. I guess the member has made his point and now we will go on.
The hon. government House leader is rising on a point of order.
Dominic LeBlanc Liberal Beauséjour, NB
Mr. Speaker, there have been some discussions among the parties and I hope if you seek it, you will find unanimous consent that the government's response to Question No. 70 be made an order for return and that the response be tabled immediately.
The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan
Does the hon. minister have the unanimous consent of the House to move the motion?
Some hon. members
Agreed.
No.