An Act to amend the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act (independent assessment)

This bill is from the 42nd Parliament, 1st session, which ended in September 2019.

Sponsor

Matthew Dubé  NDP

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of Dec. 9, 2015
(This bill did not become law.)

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment amends the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act in order to provide that, in the event of a disagreement about the property value or effective rate applicable to the federal property that is a national historic site, an assessment of the property value and effective rate applicable to that property may be conducted by a third party.

Similar bills

C-650 (41st Parliament, 2nd session) An Act to amend the Payments in Lieu of Taxes Act (independent assessment)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-201s:

C-201 (2021) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (volunteer firefighting and search and rescue volunteer services)
C-201 (2020) School Food Program for Children Act
C-201 (2020) School Food Program for Children Act
C-201 (2013) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel and accommodation deduction for tradespersons)
C-201 (2011) An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (travel and accommodation deduction for tradespersons)
C-201 (2010) An Act to amend the Canadian Forces Superannuation Act and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police Superannuation Act (deletion of deduction from annuity)

Preclearance Act, 2016Government Orders

March 6th, 2017 / 5:20 p.m.


See context

NDP

Alistair MacGregor NDP Cowichan—Malahat—Langford, BC

Mr. Speaker, my colleague from Drummond raises an excellent point. Let us go through the examples.

We can look at the clear recommendation that was made by the committee on electoral reform. We can look at the clear recommendation that was made by the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights on Bill C-201. We can look at the clear recommendations that were made by the public safety committee with respect to Bill C-22. In each one of those instances, the committee did its due diligence, listened to the experts, and presented its recommendations to the House, only to have the government completely ignore the evidence and recommendations and proceed along a predetermined path.

Therefore, my friend raises a valid concern. In every instance, the Liberals tell us to trust in the committee process. I have trust in it, but I have no trust in the government following the recommendations and hard work that those committees do on behalf of the House.