The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)

This bill is from the 43rd Parliament, 2nd session, which ended in August 2021.

Sponsor

David Lametti  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to, among other things,
(a) repeal the provision that requires a person’s natural death be reasonably foreseeable in order for them to be eligible for medical assistance in dying;
(b) specify that persons whose sole underlying medical condition is a mental illness are not eligible for medical assistance in dying;
(c) create two sets of safeguards that must be respected before medical assistance in dying may be provided to a person, the application of which depends on whether the person’s natural death is reasonably foreseeable;
(d) permit medical assistance in dying to be provided to a person who has been found eligible to receive it, whose natural death is reasonably foreseeable and who has lost the capacity to consent before medical assistance in dying is provided, on the basis of a prior agreement they entered into with the medical practitioner or nurse practitioner; and
(e) permit medical assistance in dying to be provided to a person who has lost the capacity to consent to it as a result of the self-administration of a substance that was provided to them under the provisions governing medical assistance in dying in order to cause their own death.

Similar bills

C-7 (43rd Parliament, 1st session) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-7s:

C-7 (2025) Law Appropriation Act No. 2, 2025-26
C-7 (2021) An Act to amend the Parliament of Canada Act and to make consequential and related amendments to other Acts
C-7 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Public Service Labour Relations Act, the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board Act and other Acts and to provide for certain other measures

Votes

March 11, 2021 Passed Motion respecting Senate amendments to Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)
March 11, 2021 Failed Motion respecting Senate amendments to Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying) (amendment)
March 11, 2021 Passed Motion for closure
Dec. 10, 2020 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)
Dec. 3, 2020 Passed Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)
Dec. 3, 2020 Failed Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying) (report stage amendment)
Oct. 29, 2020 Passed 2nd reading of Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-7 amends the Criminal Code regarding medical assistance in dying (MAID) by repealing the "reasonably foreseeable natural death" eligibility criterion, creating a two-track system with revised safeguards, allowing the waiver of final consent in certain cases, and modifying the monitoring regime.

Liberal

  • Addresses court deadline: Bill C-7 amends the MAID law to comply with the Quebec Superior Court's Truchon decision and meet the December 18 deadline, preventing suffering.
  • Key amendments: The bill repeals the foreseeable death requirement, creates a two-track safeguard system, and allows limited advance consent for those approved and at risk of losing capacity.
  • Balances autonomy and safeguards: The legislation respects individual autonomy by expanding access while implementing tailored safeguards, balancing competing interests and protecting vulnerable persons.
  • Criticizes delays: Liberals accuse the opposition of delaying the bill, risking the court deadline, and prolonging the suffering of Canadians seeking medical assistance in dying.

Conservative

  • Removes essential safeguards: The party opposes the bill for removing essential safeguards from the previous law, including the 10-day reflection period and witness requirements, which protect vulnerable Canadians.
  • Risks vulnerable Canadians: Conservatives express grave concerns that the bill puts vulnerable Canadians, particularly persons with disabilities, at risk by expanding access to MAID without adequate protections.
  • Inadequate palliative care: Members argue that the government is failing to invest in palliative care and other support services, potentially leading vulnerable people to choose MAID due to a lack of viable alternatives.
  • Criticizes rushed process: The party criticizes the government for rushing the bill due to self-imposed deadlines, prorogation, and failure to appeal, limiting debate and ignoring widespread opposition.

NDP

  • Supports bill C-7: The NDP supports Bill C-7 for ending unnecessary suffering, meeting the court deadline, and providing safeguards for those whose death is not reasonably foreseeable.
  • Calls for comprehensive review: The NDP calls for the overdue statutory review of MAID (Bill C-14), advocating for a special committee with an expanded mandate including safeguards for vulnerable persons.
  • Address disability vulnerability: The party highlights the vulnerability of persons with disabilities and proposes a national income support program ($2200/month) to prevent pressure to choose MAID.

Bloc

  • Supports bill C-7: The Bloc supports Bill C-7, emphasizing that caring and compassionate legislation must respect the autonomy of a dying or suffering person.
  • Opposes paternalism: The party criticizes opposition based on paternalism, arguing that it infringes on self-determination and that no one knows better than the suffering individual what is best.
  • Addresses court ruling: Bill C-7 responds to the Gladu-Truchon ruling, addressing how previous Criminal Code provisions infringed on the right to life, liberty, and security of the person.
  • Urges review of unresolved issues: The Bloc calls for an immediate parliamentary review to address issues not covered by the bill, such as advance requests, mature minors, and mental illness as a sole condition.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Corey Tochor Conservative Saskatoon—University, SK

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to answer that.

I believe that we want the same thing. The dignity that comes with a job and the inherent benefit to the individual to fulfill their potential is what we should all strive for. We know that people who are in tough economic situations may consider MAID, and we need, as a society, to push back. If it is a warm meal or a warm bed to sleep at night, that is what society should be providing people who are a little down on their luck, but we also, not to get too economically driven in our defence of having these restrictions, do understand that we need a growing economy to help more individuals out of poverty.

With poverty comes tough decisions. That is why I, as an individual member along with the Conservative members, have been voicing our concern around the direction—

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:25 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bruce Stanton

We have time for one more short question and response.

The hon. member for Yorkton—Melville.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:25 a.m.

Conservative

Cathay Wagantall Conservative Yorkton—Melville, SK

Mr. Speaker, I would just like to share, first of all, my deep condolences to the member, as I know his family well.

I just want to quote a little message I got in an email yesterday. This individual says:

I watched your speech in [the House] yesterday and was touched by it. My dad was 93 and home alone with cancer in 2005. He was so bad I wished for euthanasia. Got him in palliative care and he improved immediately. They gave him 3 weeks of improved quality of life. When things got very bad they made him painfree until he died. It changed my mind on euthanasia.

That is just a comment, again, about the dynamics of the government making a commitment to improving palliative care, yet we are not seeing that take place.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:30 a.m.

Conservative

Corey Tochor Conservative Saskatoon—University, SK

Mr. Speaker, the importance of palliative care is there, and we have spoken at great lengths that we need to make it accessible across Canada. My father actually passed away in Yorkton, where the member who posed the question is from, and I must say the people there provided outstanding palliative care that granted us a few more days with dad. That is what he wanted, and we need to make sure that is available in all parts of Canada. That is what is missing. The current government likes to virtue signal in one direction, but we see what MAID is with no additional amendments at committee. The Liberals are putting their heads down and believing that they know best for this country. I vehemently disagree with their position on this.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:30 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bruce Stanton

Is the House ready for the question?

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:30 a.m.

Some hon. members

Question

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:30 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bruce Stanton

The question is on the motion.

In the usual form, if members of recognized parties present in the House wish to request either a recorded division or that the motion be adopted on division, I invite them now to rise and indicate so to the Chair.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:30 a.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I request a recorded vote.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 11:30 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bruce Stanton

Accordingly, pursuant to an order made on Wednesday, September 23, this division stands deferred until later this day at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The House resumed consideration of the motion that Bill C-7, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying), be read the third time and passed.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 3:10 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bruce Stanton

It being 3:10 p.m., pursuant to an order made on Wednesday, September 23, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at third reading stage of C-7.

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #39

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 3:50 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Bruce Stanton

I declare the motion carried.

(Bill read the third time and passed)

Before we proceed to the next vote, we will pause briefly to allow employees who provide support for our operations to substitute each other for safety purposes. In doing that, members must recognize this group of technical and support people for their incredible efforts these past months.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

December 10th, 2020 / 3:50 p.m.

Some hon. members

Hear, hear!