Online News Act

An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada

This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in January 2025.

Sponsor

Pablo Rodriguez  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment regulates digital news intermediaries to enhance fairness in the Canadian digital news marketplace and contribute to its sustainability. It establishes a framework through which digital news intermediary operators and news businesses may enter into agreements respecting news content that is made available by digital news intermediaries. The framework takes into account principles of freedom of expression and journalistic independence.
The enactment, among other things,
(a) applies in respect of a digital news intermediary if, having regard to specific factors, there is a significant bargaining power imbalance between its operator and news businesses;
(b) authorizes the Governor in Council to make regulations respecting those factors;
(c) specifies that the enactment does not apply in respect of “broadcasting” by digital news intermediaries that are “broadcasting undertakings” as those terms are defined in the Broadcasting Act or in respect of telecommunications service providers as defined in the Telecommunications Act ;
(d) requires the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (the “Commission”) to maintain a list of digital news intermediaries in respect of which the enactment applies;
(e) requires the Commission to exempt a digital news intermediary from the application of the enactment if its operator has entered into agreements with news businesses and the Commission is of the opinion that the agreements satisfy certain criteria;
(f) authorizes the Governor in Council to make regulations respecting how the Commission is to interpret those criteria and setting out additional conditions with respect to the eligibility of a digital news intermediary for an exemption;
(g) establishes a bargaining process in respect of matters related to the making available of certain news content by digital news intermediaries;
(h) establishes eligibility criteria and a designation process for news businesses that wish to participate in the bargaining process;
(i) requires the Commission to establish a code of conduct respecting bargaining in relation to news content;
(j) prohibits digital news intermediary operators from acting, in the course of making available certain news content, in ways that discriminate unjustly, that give undue or unreasonable preference or that subject certain news businesses to an undue or unreasonable disadvantage;
(k) allows certain news businesses to make complaints to the Commission in relation to that prohibition;
(l) authorizes the Commission to require the provision of information for the purpose of exercising its powers and performing its duties and functions under the enactment;
(m) requires the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation to provide the Commission with an annual report if the Corporation is a party to an agreement with an operator;
(n) establishes a framework respecting the provision of information to the responsible Minister, the Chief Statistician of Canada and the Commissioner of Competition, while permitting an individual or entity to designate certain information that they submit to the Commission as confidential;
(o) authorizes the Commission to impose, for contraventions of the enactment, administrative monetary penalties on certain individuals and entities and conditions on the participation of news businesses in the bargaining process;
(p) establishes a mechanism for the recovery, from digital news intermediary operators, of certain costs related to the administration of the enactment; and
(q) requires the Commission to have an independent auditor prepare a report annually in respect of the impact of the enactment on the Canadian digital news marketplace.
Finally, the enactment makes related amendments to other Acts.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-18s:

C-18 (2020) Law Canada—United Kingdom Trade Continuity Agreement Implementation Act
C-18 (2020) Law Appropriation Act No. 2, 2020-21
C-18 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Rouge National Urban Park Act, the Parks Canada Agency Act and the Canada National Parks Act
C-18 (2013) Law Agricultural Growth Act

Votes

June 22, 2023 Passed Motion respecting Senate amendments to Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada
June 21, 2023 Failed Motion respecting Senate amendments to Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada (reasoned amendment)
June 20, 2023 Passed Time allocation for Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada
Dec. 14, 2022 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada
May 31, 2022 Passed 2nd reading of Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada
May 31, 2022 Failed Bill C-18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada (amendment)

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-18, also known as the Online News Act, aims to support Canadian journalism by requiring digital platforms like Google and Meta to negotiate and provide fair compensation to news businesses for the use of their content. The bill establishes a framework for these negotiations, encouraging voluntary agreements while allowing for government intervention through the CRTC if necessary, and is intended to address the decline in advertising revenue for Canadian news outlets and ensure the sustainability of independent journalism. The legislation is based on a similar model in Australia, but with increased transparency and accountability measures.

Liberal

  • Supporting a free press: The Liberal Party believes a free and independent press is essential for democracy, but that the current system where tech giants use media content without compensation is unsustainable. Bill C-18 is designed to address this by ensuring fair compensation for Canadian journalists when their content is used by tech giants.
  • Fair compensation: Bill C-18 aims to establish a market-based solution where tech giants negotiate fair deals with Canadian media outlets for the use of their content. This is intended to provide long-term, reliable, and structural support for Canadian journalism, especially local journalism, which has been struggling due to declining advertising revenues.
  • Transparency and minimal intervention: The bill is based on the Australian model but with greater transparency, ensuring criteria for platform inclusion and media outlet eligibility are public and that the government stays out of the negotiation process. The deals would be disclosed to the public, and the bill includes exemptions for platforms that sufficiently contribute to the Canadian digital news marketplace.
  • Protecting Canadian journalism: The Liberal Party emphasizes the urgency of passing Bill C-18 to protect the Canadian news industry, ensuring a level playing field and proper compensation for media outlets whose content is used by tech companies. The Party believes this is vital for maintaining a healthy democracy and combating misinformation.

Conservative

  • Supports fair compensation: Canada's Conservatives believe that news providers should be fairly compensated for the use of their content. However, they question whether Bill C-18 will help the newspapers and radio stations in rural communities and small towns across the country.
  • Concerns about smaller outlets: The Conservative party is concerned that the Australian model, on which Bill C-18 is based, may exclude small and medium-sized businesses. They are concerned that the bill will not support journalism.
  • CRTC's competency questioned: The party questions the selection of the CRTC as the regulatory body, citing its lack of experience in regulating online platforms and raising concerns about its capacity and competency, given past delays and controversies.
  • Seek committee study: Given the unanswered questions about the bill and its potential impact, the Conservatives moved to refer the subject matter of Bill C-18 to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage for further study.

NDP

  • Supports the Bill: The NDP supports the bill as a necessary step to address the crisis in the media industry and ensure the survival of local, regional, and national media outlets. They acknowledge it's not perfect but view it as a starting point.
  • Web giants must pay: The NDP emphasizes that web giants are exploiting journalistic work by aggregating news content without providing fair compensation to the news organizations that produce it. Bill C-18 is seen as a means to address this imbalance and force these companies to pay for the content they use.
  • Importance of local media: The NDP highlights the critical role of local and regional news in holding power to account and ensuring transparency, citing the example of Laval where the absence of strong local media led to corruption. They also want to see reporters and resources deployed abroad.
  • Need for collective bargaining: The NDP stresses the importance of collective bargaining for independent media outlets to negotiate fair deals with web giants. Transparency in these agreements is also crucial to ensure equitable compensation and prevent exploitation.

Bloc

  • Supports Bill C-18: The Bloc Québécois supports Bill C-18, viewing it as a necessary step to address the dominance of web giants and support the media industry. They believe the bill can help local media sustain journalism in their communities by forcing GAFAM to share revenues with local media.
  • Local media importance: The Bloc emphasizes the crucial role of local media in regional and rural communities, highlighting their contribution to community identity, accountability, and democracy. They feel that the lack of local news will hurt society as a whole, because knowing what is going on in the community is a fundamental part of democracy.
  • Concerns about eligibility: The Bloc raises concerns about the eligibility criteria for news organizations to receive compensation, particularly the requirement to employ at least two journalists, which may exclude hyper-local media outlets in remote communities. They would like daily papers employing only one journalist to be entitled to receive their share as well, to more accurately reflect the reality of media in remote areas.
  • Need for financial aid: The Bloc stresses the immediate need for financial aid to struggling small media outlets, as the benefits of Bill C-18 may take months or years to materialize. They suggest that Ottawa should ensure that its ads are placed in these local media outlets that are struggling to bring in significant revenue.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:50 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the question and I think there is a great deal of interest not only on my part but from within the Liberal caucus and hopefully others, such as the member, in recognizing the importance of the smaller news agencies. That is one of the reasons I incorporated this point in my comments and talked about ensuring fairer compensation for both large and small media outlets. They are absolutely critical, especially to our local communities.

I really do believe that this legislation would enhance that sense of fairness for both large and small media outlets. If there are things that we could do to better ensure that outcome, I would encourage my New Democratic friends to raise the issue and bring up the example, and if they have an amendment, to share it with the minister or the staff. They do not have to wait until it goes to committee; they can do that at any point in time. I am sure that if there are ways in which we can improve the bill, the minister would be open to them.

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:50 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, I am very troubled by what has happened to journalism in Canada. I agree, as the hon. parliamentary secretary said, that democracy itself is under assault when we lose our local journalists. In fact, there have been empirical studies that show that as parliamentary bureaus of local papers across Canada close up shop, the level of voting in those communities goes down. I agree with the diagnosis, but I do not know that we have the right prescription.

What we now see in Australia are a lot of concerns after the Australian model, which we are now pursuing, has been used as a big stick to drive people to private negotiations with no transparency. There is a lot of concern about following this model.

I am not saying I am against it and I want to figure out how it might work, but surely the simplest thing is to go to the source and say to Google, Twitter, Facebook and anything that is undermining our journalism that they are publishers, just like the newspapers. They are not platforms but publishers, and they have to follow all the same rules as print journalism in Canada.

Would the hon. member comment on that?

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:50 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, for many years, giant tech companies such as Facebook, Google and YouTube have been going around the world and getting away with a great deal while enriching themselves worldwide. We are seeing more countries today saying that it is not acceptable and that we want to ensure that there is protection for their media industries, and that is something that is very tangible coming from this government. This legislation will go a long way toward ensuring a higher sense of fair compensation and protecting a critically important industry.

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:50 p.m.

Liberal

Lloyd Longfield Liberal Guelph, ON

Mr. Speaker, thank you for fitting me into this debate.

I would say this to the hon. member for Winnipeg North: We just heard a comment from the Conservatives across the way that they did not want to hear from him because he had an alternative point of view. In fact, a lot of news is presented online in a biased fashion. Could the member talk about news as entertainment versus news as a source of information on the different points of view that help to inform us?

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:50 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the question. That is why I shared the story of the gentleman who would show up and talk to me. After a few weeks, I could tell exactly what outlet he was using as his source. It was always the same outlet. When I made the suggestion that he try to expand and look at other media outlets, he literally stopped coming. It was a pleasant discussion we had.

The point is that it is very important that we be supportive of our news industry and journalists. That is what this legislation is all about. It is about ensuring there is proper compensation. We have some of the best journalists in the world and we need to support them. We need to be there for the industry. It is healthier for our democracy.

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:55 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon—Grasswood, SK

Mr. Speaker, it has been an enjoyable afternoon listening to some of the fairy tales from the government, because it is cutting off debate after two hours on a bill that, from coast to coast, we have not seen much of.

Bill C-18 is an interesting bill. As a former journalist and broadcaster, I am glad today that I have the opportunity to speak to this bill and right the ship, if the House does not mind.

I spent 40 years in the industry, in radio and television. I began the career in Yorkton, working midnights as a disk jockey. I spent some time in Melfort doing radio. I moved over to CFQC in Saskatoon—

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:55 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader is rising on a point of order.

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:55 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, I apologize to my friend for interrupting.

There is an incredible amount of background noise going on just outside the chamber. Perhaps you could pass along an instruction for them to quiet down a bit.

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:55 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

I appreciate that intervention. I try to remind folks as they come into the chamber and the lobbies to keep their conversations a lot quieter, because the sound coming over from the other side is a little too much for this House of Commons. Again I would ask members coming into the House to keep the lobby doors closed to keep the volume down.

I apologize. The hon. member for Saskatoon—Grasswood has three minutes.

Second ReadingOnline News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 1:55 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon—Grasswood, SK

Mr. Speaker, picking back up, I spent some time at Melfort, went over to Saskatoon in radio and then spent the majority of my career as a sports journalist and anchor at CTV News Saskatoon.

As a journalist, I remember having the opportunity to travel and cover some of the biggest news stories in Saskatchewan's history. I was on the field for countless Roughriders games, Grey Cup championships, Olympics and world curling championships. I remember covering the historic attempt when Saskatoon and Saskatchewan tried to get the St. Louis Blues to move to Saskatoon. That was in the 1980s.

What a success entrepreneur Bill Hunter and his group had back then, as they had thousands of people activated in our province, all going through the news media. We went to Madison Square Garden in New York for the NHL hearings. I remember the night before the hearings I was in the New York Islanders' dressing room celebrating the team's four-game sweep of the Edmonton Oilers. I talked to the many Saskatchewan-born players on the Islanders' team: Bryan Trottier, Bob Bourne and so on. It was a historic week being in New York trying to get the St. Louis Blues back to Saskatchewan and Canada.

I am afraid those stories would probably not be told today because of the lack of budgets for small- and medium-sized news organizations in this country. They have cut their staff, some down entirely to zero. In stations that actually remain, the person we hear on the air is often the only person in the entire building. Big stations are not exempt from this either. I have seen my fair share of colleagues and friends over the years being shown the door when cuts came around to address lagging revenues.

Earlier in my career, though, I worked late nights covering the station at a time when there was actually live coverage of radio throughout the night. Now, most stations are live for maybe six hours a day, or 12 at best. It is actually exclusively pre-recorded and it is satellite radio. This is a shame because where can young broadcasters get into the business now when, with a flip of the switch, people can have satellite radio?

We are getting ready for question period, and I will, as they say, come back for the rest of the story.

The House resumed consideration of the motion that Bill C‑18, An Act respecting online communications platforms that make news content available to persons in Canada, be read the second time and referred to a committee, and of the amendment.

Online News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 7:35 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

The question is on the amendment.

Shall I dispense?

Online News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 7:35 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

Online News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 7:35 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

[Chair read text of amendment to House]

If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes to request a recorded division or that the amendment be adopted on division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

The hon. House leader of the official opposition.

Online News ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2022 / 7:35 p.m.

Conservative

John Brassard Conservative Barrie—Innisfil, ON

Madam Speaker, that is correct. I am the House leader, and I request a recorded division.