National Council for Reconciliation Act

An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation

Sponsor

Marc Miller  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is, or will soon become, law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment provides for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation as an independent, non-political, permanent and Indigenous-led organization whose purpose is to advance reconciliation between Indigenous peoples and non-Indigenous peoples.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-29s:

C-29 (2021) Law Port of Montreal Operations Act, 2021
C-29 (2016) Law Budget Implementation Act, 2016, No. 2
C-29 (2014) Law Appropriation Act No. 1, 2014-15
C-29 (2011) Law Appropriation Act No. 3, 2011-12

Votes

April 29, 2024 Passed Motion respecting Senate amendments to Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation
March 20, 2024 Passed Time allocation for Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation
Dec. 1, 2022 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation
Nov. 29, 2022 Passed Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation
Nov. 29, 2022 Passed Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation (report stage amendment)
Nov. 29, 2022 Passed Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation (report stage amendment)
Nov. 29, 2022 Passed Bill C-29, An Act to provide for the establishment of a national council for reconciliation (report stage amendment)

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-29 aims to establish a National Council for Reconciliation to monitor, evaluate, and report on Canada's progress on reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, responding to several calls to action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. The council would be an independent, Indigenous-led organization responsible for identifying systemic injustices, promoting Indigenous languages, and ensuring accountability from the government. Amendments were made to the bill to ensure diverse representation on the board of directors and to clarify the council's duties.

Liberal

  • Establishing accountability: The Liberal party is committed to pursuing reconciliation and holding the government accountable for historical wrongs against Indigenous peoples. The national council for reconciliation would be an institutional mechanism to hold Canada accountable for meeting goals on the path toward reconciliation.
  • Indigenous-led council: Bill C-29 would establish a permanent, indigenous-led, independent council with a mandate to monitor and support reconciliation, including implementing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’s calls to action. It would be driven by the active participation of First Nations, Inuit and Métis communities, organizations and individuals.
  • Diversity and inclusion: Amendments have been made to ensure that the board of directors promotes diversity and inclusion. Additional voices have been added, including those from the territories, elders and, very importantly, survivors of residential schools and other discriminatory policies, and their descendants.
  • Annual reporting: The council would compile an annual report outlining the progress of reconciliation and offer recommendations for change. The government of the day would be required to respond to the report and outline its plans to advance reconciliation.

Conservative

  • Supports Bill C-29: The Conservatives see the bill as a step in the right direction. They believe there is agreement that past policies need correcting and compensating.
  • Focus on economic reconciliation: The Conservatives put forward a motion to amend Bill C-29 to incorporate the concept of economic reconciliation, but the other parties voted against it. They argue that without economic reconciliation, there is no reconciliation.
  • Amendments to improve the bill: The Conservatives brought forward amendments to strengthen Bill C-29, and 17 of the 19 amendments were passed at committee. These amendments aimed to address transparency, independence, accountability, and measurable outcomes.
  • Disappointment about CAP: The Conservatives are disappointed that the government did not accept the amendment to add a seat for the Congress of Aboriginal Peoples, a national indigenous organization representing over 800,000 urban indigenous people.

NDP

  • Supports the bill: The NDP supports Bill C-29, highlighting it as a crucial step towards reconciliation, emphasizing the need for accountability and action. They stress the importance of centering survivors' voices and addressing ongoing injustices faced by Indigenous peoples.
  • Survivors must lead the way: The NDP insists that the voices of survivors, descendants, and elders must guide reconciliation efforts, not organizations or government bureaucrats. They emphasize that the legislation is a result of survivors courageously sharing their stories and seek to ensure their voices are not overshadowed.
  • Need for concrete action: While supporting the bill, the NDP stresses that monitoring alone is insufficient, urging the government to invest in concrete actions addressing the housing crisis, violence against Indigenous women, and resource extraction projects imposed without consent. They seek to overturn colonial policies hindering true reconciliation.
  • Council must be rights-based: The NDP emphasizes that the council's work on advancing reconciliation must be based on rights, and they highlight amendments they made to ensure advice from survivors, elders, and indigenous legal professionals are included. They also emphasize the importance of the council in addressing the violations of Indigenous rights, including housing, self-determination, and access to lands.

Bloc

  • Supports the bill's intent: The Bloc supports the bill's aim to address truth and reconciliation for indigenous peoples, including First Nations, Inuit, and Métis people, while emphasizing the need for respectful and inclusive dialogue.
  • Problems with 'reconciliation' term: Many indigenous people do not agree with the term "reconciliation", as it implies a pre-existing conciliation and relationship that did not exist and the term is not clearly defined.
  • Concerns about consultations: The Bloc expresses concern that consultations were limited and not representative of all indigenous communities, with some communities being unaware of the consultations or the bill itself.
  • Need for board independence: The Bloc emphasizes the importance of ensuring the board's autonomy and independence, with members eventually appointed by the transitional board rather than solely by the minister.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5 p.m.

Conservative

Gary Vidal Conservative Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River, SK

Mr. Speaker, it has been a pleasure to work with my colleague from the Bloc at committee. We did get a lot of good work done.

My question is very simple. Bill C-29 originally came to the House without any concrete measurables, without anything to measure. We talked a lot about the fact that if we want to measure accountability, we must set some targets that determine success from failure.

Call to action 55 included a number of those quantifiable measurable items. Why does the member believe those measurable goals were excluded in the first place?

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5 p.m.

Bloc

Marilène Gill Bloc Manicouagan, QC

Mr. Speaker, we have a lot of questions when we see the first iteration of a bill. We always notice things that are missing. We often draw a comparison with the private sector. If a company wants to meet goals, it needs specific targets, deadlines and, in short, the means to achieve these goals. I did not get an answer to that question or several others, but I do believe it is necessary in order to get things done and meet goals.

As my colleague stated many times, what we want is not just to make some progress, but to make efforts to move forward. That word was taken out, incidentally. We got the word “efforts” taken out because it should already be understood. All we want is to make progress. I believe that having clear, specific goals to meet is absolutely necessary.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot, QC

Mr. Speaker, let me digress for a moment to talk about language learning. A few years ago, in 2018, in an effort to reconnect with my roots, I was able to take classes in the Wendat language from an office in Montreal, even though Wendake is in the Quebec City area. I salute the efforts that the Wendake officials made at that time to spread their language to their diaspora. I say bravo to them.

Now, I am entirely in favour, and we are all in favour, of this national council for reconciliation, despite the reservations some may have about the word “reconciliation”, as my colleague said.

That being said, it is all well and good to begin speeches with references to unceded territory and all that, but as long as the Indian Act, a title that is racist in itself, remains in place, what is the point?

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5 p.m.

Bloc

Marilène Gill Bloc Manicouagan, QC

Mr. Speaker, if I think of the indigenous people I represent, when we talk about systemic racism, the Indian Act is perhaps the most obvious example, and certainly for all of us, it is shameful that it still exists.

Obviously, it is bad to be out of step with the times, and this is something that needs to change. I spoke of symbolism. We are talking about concrete actions, but we will have to go further and tackle the relics of colonialism, although the word “relics” is too weak.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I think it is important in the sense that we have before us legislation that would establish a national council. That council has been in the makings now for a while. We have had an interim council that has been advising the government and which has assisted in getting us to the point where we are today.

The member made reference, as have other members, to a number of indigenous-related issues, especially the issue of reconciliation. I am wondering if the member could expand her thoughts on the 94 calls to action and the fact that a lot of those have a shared jurisdiction. Not all of them are federal. The council would play such a critical role going forward in terms of ensuring how that reconciliation would be best achieved.

Could the member provide her thoughts on the significance of that fact?

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5 p.m.

Bloc

Marilène Gill Bloc Manicouagan, QC

Mr. Speaker, if I were to try to sum up my thoughts on the importance of the council with respect to the calls to action and how effective the council itself will be, I would say that it is going to be up to the indigenous people themselves.

One of the things I forgot to mention in my speech is that one of the government's responsibilities will be to provide all the information that indigenous people feel is necessary to do this work.

That is important, but the government will not be able to free itself of all its responsibilities, either. It must ensure that it does not prevent the council from functioning properly.

On the one hand, the council must be independent, but at the same time, the government is responsible for providing everything that is needed for concrete action to be taken until the Indian Act and all colonial practices are completely abandoned.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:05 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague from Manicouagan for her speech.

As the critic for seniors, I was touched that she mentioned them in her speech and that she addressed the issue of indigenous women and girls.

Bill C-29 deals with the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's calls to action. However, I wonder if my colleague could comment on the calls for justice from the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. What is stopping the government from implementing them?

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:05 p.m.

Bloc

Marilène Gill Bloc Manicouagan, QC

Mr. Speaker, I am entering my eighth year as the MP for Manicouagan. I have seen some great successes over the years, but at times I become cynical. When that happens, I tell myself that it is a question of willingness.

We have seen it many times: Large sums of money are spent, very easily, without any criteria. It is not always clear which numbers go with what. There can be some secrecy there.

There are some real concerns right now. We have concrete demands that everyone agrees on, but nothing is happening. We talk about elders, women and girls, and housing is part of that as well. It is one of the factors that keeps this violence going. Then there is the fact that seniors are facing difficulties and health is an issue.

I totally agree with my colleague. It is a question of willingness. That is perhaps one of the only things I cannot give the government as an opposition member.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:05 p.m.

NDP

Leah Gazan NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

Mr. Speaker, I seek unanimous consent to split my time.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Is it agreed?

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:05 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:05 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

The hon. member for Winnipeg Centre.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:05 p.m.

NDP

Leah Gazan NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

Mr. Speaker, I will be splitting my time with the hon. member for Nunavut.

It is an honour to rise today in support of Bill C-29, the national council for reconciliation act. We would not be here today without the stories of survivors who gifted us with stories so that people across Canada could learn the truth about Canada's history, that what happened in residential schools was an act of genocide, something that was acknowledged unanimously in October in the House, a recognition that what happened in these institutions against children was an act of genocide and the experiences of survivors' abuse and abhorrent human rights violations are no longer left up for debate. I want to share that I am so thankful for that. I lift up survivors, descendants and communities every day. Let us not lose sight of this while we debate this bill.

We must not lose sight of this. The voices of survivors must lead the path forward, not organizations and not government bureaucrats, but survivors and their descendants, elders. I am glad that this is reflected in the bill, but I am hoping that this is reflected in the debate we are having in the House as we move forward because we have to remember that we would not be debating this legislation today if it had not been for survivors who courageously shared their stories. We must not lose sight of that. Their voices must never ever be overshadowed, because they are the reason we are discussing how to move forward in a manner that achieves real justice while addressing ongoing injustices that continue to be perpetrated against indigenous peoples.

Progress is slow, which is one of the reasons that I keenly support implementing call to action 53 of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission to establish a national council for reconciliation through the establishment of federal legislation. Call to action 53 calls on the government to establish the council as an “independent, national, oversight body” that will monitor, evaluate and report to Parliament on the progress that is being made with regard to reconciliation.

The accountability mechanisms that have the potential to be provided by the council are crucial, because we know that without sufficient accountability, progress implementing the calls to actions has been unacceptably slow. Since the calls to action were released in 2015, only about 13 of the 94 have been implemented. For a government that has repeatedly identified reconciliation and the new relationship with indigenous people as a top priority, this is simply not good enough. One wonders if this legislation was introduced seven years ago whether we would be further along completing all of the calls to action.

Nevertheless, the fact that we are close to this bill becoming law is an important step forward. Enshrining this legislation into Canadian law is critical. Having this council act as a watchdog to ensure the effect of advancement of reconciliation is crucial and will make it more difficult for the government and all MPs to lose focus on the implementation of the calls to action from the Truth and Reconciliation Commission.

However, here is the reality. Monitoring is not enough. We need the government to do the work and put significant investments behind concrete acts of reconciliation, and there is so much more work that needs to be done. I have often said that we cannot have true reconciliation in the absence of justice. Across this country, indigenous peoples are denied justice each and every day in painful and humiliating ways.

We have a housing crisis that can only be described as dire. According to the 2021 census data, one in six indigenous people live in crowded housing unsuitable for the number of people who live there. To put this into perspective, that means indigenous people are almost twice as likely to live in crowded housing compared to non-indigenous people. This is shameful.

While I acknowledge that budget 2022 made new investments in indigenous housing, it does not come close to meeting the unmet needs in indigenous communities, in spite of the Conservatives' claim today of record spending on indigenous peoples. According to the AFN, $44 billion over 10 years would be required to meet current needs on first nations' communities. Budget 2022 allocates $2.4 billion over five years to address gaps in on-reserve housing.

We are also facing what the Prime Minister himself has acknowledged as a genocide against indigenous women, girls and two-spirit people. My own city of Winnipeg was described as “ground zero” for the crisis of missing and murdered indigenous women and girls by the former minister of crown-indigenous relations, yet since the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls issued its final report and calls for justice in 2019, we have not seen this ongoing genocide addressed with anything close to the level of respect and urgency required.

For example, in budget 2022, the Liberal government put in zero new dollars to help put an end to this crisis of violence. Worse yet, it was shocking to learn that hardly any of the federal government's $724.1-million violence prevention strategy, first announced in 2021, has been spent. Not a single new shelter has been built nor a single new unit of transitional housing.

While I do want to acknowledge the federal government’s recent announcement in my riding of $6.9 million to support the expansion of Velma’s House, which will operate as a low-barrier, 24-7 safe space in Winnipeg Centre, there are still so many indigenous women, girls and gender-diverse people who do not have a safe place to go to in their community.

We also continue to see resource extraction projects imposed on indigenous communities without their free, prior and informed consent. An egregious example of this took place almost two years ago on Wet'suwet'en territory, where land defenders, women, were met with police dogs and snipers, and the RCMP used an axe and a chainsaw to cut down the door of a tiny house where two unarmed indigenous women were inside. This is the exact opposite of what reconciliation looks like.

I have become quite concerned about the Conservatives hyper focus on economic reconciliation with their history of opposing the right of free prior and informed consent, which is enshrined in Canadian law and articulated in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Indigenous peoples have a right to make decisions free of intimidation, and to be informed about all aspects of projects prior to development occurring. This cannot happen down the barrel of a gun. It also is not acceptable to state that communities that choose to build economies outside of the resource extraction sector have no desire to improve their local economy. On these and so many other issues, including the overrepresentation of indigenous peoples in the criminal justice and child welfare systems, and the fact that 27 communities still have boil water advisories, so much work must be done to overturn colonial policies and practices that are preventing us from achieving real reconciliation.

I am hoping that this legislation will help. I want to acknowledge the work of my wonderful colleague and MP for Nunavut in helping to strengthen this legislation at committee. We will be accompanied by a renewed focus from the government on what the Prime Minister has described as the “most important” relationship in Canada. I am confident that the council will do its job in ensuring that the government is accountable for progress being made on implementing the calls to action, but the onus is on the government to respond to accountability with real action.

To all the survivors who share their stories, to all survivors who did not tell their stories, I lift them up. May the bill assist in delivering them the justice that has been denied for far too long.

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:15 p.m.

Sydney—Victoria Nova Scotia

Liberal

Jaime Battiste LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations

Mr. Speaker, I am really glad the member opposite mentioned the survivors. We should never lose sight of the survivors when we are looking at Bill C-29. I think about so many of the survivors who have come to me in my community and said that what we really need to move forward are healing centres and healing for their communities. They have given me the example of wanting the trauma to stop with them.

I am wondering if the member opposite could speak to some of the people in her riding or in her nation who have inspired her in this journey of reconciliation. Could she talk a bit about the need for us to continue the journey of healing and investing in healing in indigenous communities and urban communities across Canada?

National Council for Reconciliation ActGovernment Orders

November 29th, 2022 / 5:20 p.m.

NDP

Leah Gazan NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

Mr. Speaker, I will take this opportunity to mention my wonderful partner, Romeo Saganash, who is a residential school survivor and has spent his life fighting to achieve that reconciliation. I think, when we are looking at this, and certainly having the privilege of being blessed with such a good partner, the truth and reconciliation is based on the stories of survivors.

They set the path forward. Those are the stories. Now the government has to respond to those stories with action. It needs to stop stalling, and I am hoping the oversight that would be provided by this council would allow survivors, such as my beautiful partner, Romeo, to get the justice that is long overdue.