An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)

Sponsor

Ed Fast  Conservative

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Defeated, as of Oct. 18, 2023

Subscribe to a feed (what's a feed?) of speeches and votes in the House related to Bill C-314.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment amends the Criminal Code to provide that a mental disorder is not a grievous and irremediable medical condition for which a person could receive medical assistance in dying.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from the Library of Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Votes

Oct. 18, 2023 Failed 2nd reading of Bill C-314, An Act to amend the Criminal Code (medical assistance in dying)

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 17th, 2023 / 11:50 p.m.


See context

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 17th, 2023 / 11:50 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Corey Tochor Conservative Saskatoon—University, SK

Now they heckle me, Madam Speaker.

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 17th, 2023 / 11:50 p.m.


See context

An hon. member

We've been heckling the whole time.

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 17th, 2023 / 11:50 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Corey Tochor Conservative Saskatoon—University, SK

Madam Speaker, I think the most hypocritical thing I have seen with the Liberals is in the bill before us, where they target law-abiding firearms owners instead of the criminals who are committing the crimes. They cry for the victims, and we should all cry for families when they have faced criminal activities that have robbed them of their loved ones. However, we should understand that their efforts are going after the wrong people out there.

Grandpa Joe's firearm is not what is shooting up downtown Vancouver and Toronto.

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 17th, 2023 / 11:50 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Rob Moore Conservative Fundy Royal, NB

Madam Speaker, it is an honour to close out debate this evening on Bill C-21, and it is an honour, as always, to stand in this House and represent the constituents from the great riding of Fundy Royal who elected me. Many of those constituents enjoy hunting, farming and sport shooting and maybe have inherited a firearm from a relative. Hunting in my riding certainly is something many people like to partake in and enjoy.

What is the problem we are trying to go after? It is gun violence. What the facts tell us is that 80% of the firearms used in violent crime are illegal. What are some of the figures? Violent crime is up 32% in Canada in the last eight years. Gang-related violent crime, the stuff Canadians are talking about, seeing in the news and hearing about in their local newspaper, is up almost 100% in the last eight years. What about crimes that are committed with firearms? Eighty per cent of the firearms used in violent crime are obtained illegally. We have an illegal firearms problem in Canada.

What is the solution when we have an illegal firearms problem? We should go after the illegal firearms. The last thing we should do is spend valuable resources going after law-abiding, licensed firearms owners in this country. However, we should not be surprised that this is the approach the government took. We have to remember this is the same Liberal government that brought in Bill C-68, or the long gun registry, and that spent, according to the Auditor General, over $1 billion registering the firearms of law-abiding Canadians while having no impact on crime.

It is the same government that brought in Bill C-5. What did Bill C-5 do? I mentioned that we have a problem with illegal firearms. Bill C-5, which was introduced and passed under the current government, repealed mandatory prison penalties for many firearms offences. They include robbery with a firearm, extortion with a firearm and weapons trafficking. These are the types of offences that Canadians would expect someone convicted to go to jail for. Unfortunately, Bill C-5 removed mandatary jail sentences for those crimes, so we are not going after the illegal guns and we are not going after the criminals.

The figures should get the attention of all members, no matter what side of the aisle they are on. In Toronto alone, one half of murder suspects this year are out on some type of release. In 17 of 44 homicides in Toronto last year, the individual was out on bail. We have a major problem in this country when it comes to gang-related violence and firearms violence with the revolving door, the catch-and-release, of our bail system.

The government had an opportunity with this bill to tackle some of those things. Instead, what it did is went after everyday, law-abiding Canadians, the type of Canadians I represent in my riding of Fundy Royal.

As parliamentarians, we need to take the issues that confront us in this country seriously. This bill does not do that. The government showed its hand when it brought it an amendment that would have banned all kinds of hunting rifles, rifles that have been in families for generations. These are not the problem. Law-abiding Canadians are not the problem. Licensed firearms owners are not the problem. Spending billions of dollars of taxpayers' money to buy back and confiscate firearms from law-abiding citizens is not the solution.

When this bill is fully implemented, Canadians will not be one bit safer. Until we have the courage to tackle the revolving door of catch-and-release bail and until we have the courage to say that those who do serious crimes are going to get a jail sentence, we will continue to have these problems in Canada. We need to leave law-abiding people alone and go after the bad guys, and that is what the Conservatives will do.

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 17th, 2023 / 11:55 p.m.


See context

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

It being 11:59 p.m., pursuant to order made on Tuesday, May 9, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the third reading stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on the amendment.

If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes that the amendment be carried or carried on division or wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 18th, 2023 / midnight


See context

Liberal

Chris Bittle Liberal St. Catharines, ON

Madam Speaker, we request a recorded division.

Sitting ResumedCriminal CodeGovernment Orders

May 18th, 2023 / midnight


See context

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

Pursuant to order made on Thursday, June 23, 2022, the division on the amendment stands deferred until Thursday, May 18, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

It being 12:01 a.m., the House stands adjourned until later this day at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 21(1).

(The House adjourned at 12:01 a.m.)

The House resumed from October 4 consideration of the motion that Bill S-12, An Act to amend the Criminal Code, the Sex Offender Information Registration Act and the International Transfer of Offenders Act, be read the second time and referred to a committee.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

October 5th, 2023 / 3:55 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

It being 3:55 p.m., the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at second reading stage of Bill S-12.

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #417

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

October 5th, 2023 / 4:25 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

I declare the motion carried.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

October 5th, 2023 / 4:25 p.m.


See context

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. During the roll call vote, from the government benches, the member for Fredericton voted and then left the chamber before the vote was reported in the House. I would like to know whether that vote will count under the current voting rules or whether it should be stricken from the record.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

October 5th, 2023 / 4:25 p.m.


See context

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

I believe the member for Fredericton left the chamber before the vote was complete.

Criminal CodeGovernment Orders

October 5th, 2023 / 4:25 p.m.


See context

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, given where we are in the session, we are not going to argue the member's vote should count, unless there is unanimous leave to count it this time around. We will ensure that it will not happen again in the future.