The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15

Pharmacare Act

An Act respecting pharmacare

This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in January 2025.

Sponsor

Mark Holland  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment sets out the principles that the Minister of Health is to consider when working towards the implementation of national universal pharmacare and obliges the Minister to make payments, in certain circumstances, in relation to the coverage of certain prescription drugs and related products. It also sets out certain powers and obligations of the Minister — including in relation to the preparation of a list to inform the development of a national formulary and in relation to the development of a national bulk purchasing strategy — and requires the Minister to publish a pan-Canadian strategy regarding the appropriate use of prescription drugs and related products. Finally, it provides for the establishment of a committee of experts to make certain recommendations.

Similar bills

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-64s:

C-64 (2017) Law Wrecked, Abandoned or Hazardous Vessels Act
C-64 (2015) Law Georges Bank Protection Act
C-64 (2013) Law Appropriation Act No. 3, 2013-14
C-64 (2009) Law Appropriation Act No. 4, 2009-2010

Votes

June 3, 2024 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare
May 30, 2024 Passed Concurrence at report stage of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare
May 30, 2024 Failed Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare (report stage amendment)
May 7, 2024 Passed 2nd reading of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare
May 7, 2024 Failed 2nd reading of Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare (reasoned amendment)
May 6, 2024 Passed Time allocation for Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-64 aims to establish a framework for a national pharmacare program in Canada, beginning with universal, single-payer coverage for certain contraceptives and diabetes medications, with the goal of improving access, affordability, and health outcomes. The bill also calls for the creation of a national formulary and bulk purchasing strategy, while emphasizing the need to collaborate with provinces and territories for the administration of healthcare. The legislation has sparked debate over its potential impact on existing private insurance plans, its limited scope of coverage, and the extent of provincial consultation.

Liberal

  • Supports national pharmacare: The Liberal Party supports Bill C-64, seeing it as a significant step toward establishing a national pharmacare program in Canada. They view it as a means to ensure Canadians have access to necessary medications, regardless of their ability to pay.
  • Focus on access and affordability: The Liberals emphasize the importance of improving access to and affordability of prescription drugs. They cite statistics showing that many Canadians lack sufficient insurance coverage for medications, forcing them to choose between healthcare and basic necessities.
  • Working with provinces: The Liberal Party highlights the importance of collaboration with provinces and territories in implementing the national pharmacare program. They aim to work with these partners to provide universal single-payer coverage for contraceptives and diabetes medications.
  • Cost saving potential: The Liberals believe that a national pharmacare program has the potential to generate long-term savings for the healthcare system. They argue that the current system, with its patchwork of private and public plans, is inefficient and costly.
  • Appropriate drug use: The Liberal Party also focuses on the principle of appropriate drug use within the pharmacare framework. They stress the importance of a pan-Canadian strategy to ensure that patients receive the right medications at the right time and in the correct dosages, while minimizing potential harms and costs.

Conservative

  • Flawed legislation: The Conservatives believe the bill is flawed and cannot be fixed, and that the only proper fix is to bury it. The bill has been rushed through the House without proper scrutiny, and the government is trying to tout the pamphlet as being historic and groundbreaking, when the Liberals neglected to listen to the very people who would be most impacted by the shoddy work of the file.
  • Interfering in provincial jurisdiction: The Conservatives believe that the bill interferes in provincial jurisdictions and that it was born of the Liberals' need to keep a minority government alive. The bill is an attempt by the Liberal government to interfere in provincial jurisdictions without consultation.
  • Inadequate coverage: The Conservatives argue that the bill does not provide universal pharmacare, and that it only covers contraception and diabetes medications. This limited coverage is not what Canadians were expecting, and that it is an empty promise.
  • Risk to private insurance: The Conservatives believe that the bill would replace the private insurance system with a single insurance system, which would be a federal monopoly administered by a centralizing and incompetent Liberal government. The bill risks disrupting existing prescription drug coverage paid for by employers, limiting choice, and using scarce federal resources to simply replace existing coverage while leaving a huge gap for uninsured Canadians who rely on other medications beyond diabetic drugs and contraceptives.

NDP

  • Supporting pharmacare bill: The NDP supports the pharmacare bill as a means to provide essential medication to Canadians who struggle to afford it. They view it as a way to help people like Amber, who struggles to pay for her diabetes medication, and see it as a significant step towards universal healthcare.
  • Criticism of Conservative opposition: The NDP criticizes the Conservative party for what they view as obstructionist tactics, such as attempting to delete the entire bill and wasting taxpayer money on debates, rather than working to help people access necessary medications. They contrast this with what they see as Conservative priorities of supporting corporations and banks.
  • Building on NDP successes: The NDP highlights their role in forcing the government to implement dental care and aims to replicate this success with pharmacare. They emphasize the positive impact of dental care on seniors and express their determination to provide similar support for medication costs.
  • Indigenous access concerns: The NDP acknowledges concerns that the bill may not go far enough for Indigenous peoples and emphasizes the need for immediate discussions to ensure that First Nations, Inuit, and Northerners see improved healthcare closer to home. They want to avoid the pitfalls of the Non-Insured Health Benefits program.

Bloc

  • Opposes federal intrusion: The Bloc Québécois opposes the bill, arguing it represents federal intrusion into provincial jurisdiction. They advocate for unconditional financial transfers to Quebec to improve its existing pharmacare program.
  • Quebec's existing system: The Bloc emphasizes that Quebec already has a mixed insurance system that covers a wide range of drugs. They argue that federal involvement duplicates efforts and is less efficient than improving Quebec's existing framework.
  • Amendment rejected: The Bloc proposed an amendment that would allow provinces to opt out of the national pharmacare program with full compensation, but it was rejected. They see this as a violation of the Canadian Constitution and Quebec's right to manage its own affairs.
  • Fiscal imbalance: The Bloc raises the issue of fiscal imbalance, stating that the provinces have insufficient financial resources compared to the federal government. They contend that Quebec is chronically underfunded and should receive its share of federal funds to manage its own social programs.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:15 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, I will talk about someone who is insured. Sheila wrote to me and said that with two type 1s in the family, with one suffering from multiple complications from 50 years with the disease, their out-of-pocket medical expenses are about $18,000 a year, and that is with extended medical. Otherwise, it would be about $30,000. That is one paycheque just to keep everyone alive and well. Maybe my colleague can say a few words to Sheila on why he is blocking getting her the help she deserves and needs.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:15 p.m.

Conservative

Robert Gordon Kitchen Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Mr. Speaker, I applaud the member for Courtenay—Alberni, with whom I have worked on health care many times over the last nine years, for his passion and care for his constituents and for his desire to do the best that he believes he can to help. I do believe he is doing what he can to help. Ultimately, though, this piece of legislation is about diabetes coverage. It is not about rare diseases. It is about diabetes coverage, and that diabetes coverage would actually be less than what is available in other programs.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:15 p.m.

Conservative

Warren Steinley Conservative Regina—Lewvan, SK

Mr. Speaker, we have lived through the NDPs in Saskatchewan. When they were in power the last time, they closed 52 hospitals, closed 1,000 care beds and fired 1,000 nurses. They were an unmitigated disaster, and that is why they will never govern in Saskatchewan again.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:15 p.m.

Conservative

Robert Gordon Kitchen Conservative Souris—Moose Mountain, SK

Mr. Speaker, my colleague from Regina—Lewvan is so right. In Saskatchewan, we saw the total destruction of the system under the NDP government. Today, we see the building of beds to be provided for drug addicts and meth addicts. They are being provided by the provincial government because it is the provincial government's responsibility to provide that coverage.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:20 p.m.

Liberal

Patrick Weiler Liberal West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast—Sea to Sky Country, BC

Mr. Speaker, I am very pleased to rise in the House to speak to Bill C‑64.

It is a great pleasure to join the debate today about the pharmacare legislation that is going to bring in the first steps of pharmacare in Canada, as well as to be the last person to give a speech before we actually vote on this important piece of legislation.

Quality health care, including access to prescription drugs, is vital to protecting and promoting the health and well-being of Canadians. Prescription medicines allow millions of Canadians to prevent and fight disease, manage chronic illness, ease pain and breathe better; in other words, they allow Canadians to live healthier and more productive lives. I must say, there are few issues that I hear more about than health care as a priority for my constituents.

With rising costs, some Canadians are facing difficult choices between paying for their prescriptions and covering essentials, such as food and heat. Nobody should be put in that circumstance. We need to ensure that prescription drugs are more accessible and affordable for Canadians, including those facing the greatest financial barriers to accessing medications. That is why our government has introduced the pharmacare act. The bill proposes foundational principles for national universal pharmacare and describes the government's intent to work with provinces and territories to provide Canadians with universal, single-payer, first-dollar coverage for a range of contraceptive and diabetes products.

When medicare was introduced in Canada in the 1960s, prescription drugs played a relatively limited role in health care. Most drugs outside of a hospital were inexpensive medicines for common conditions. However, in the intervening decades, the development of drugs has surged as pharmaceutical companies have pushed the science further in search of new treatments and cures. Prescription medicines are now an essential part of health care. As a share of overall health care costs, spending on prescribed drugs has risen from six per cent in 1975 to nearly 14% in 2022. This makes prescription drugs the second-largest area of health care spending in Canada, after hospital services.

Today, the landscape of prescription drugs available in Canada is robust and complex, with pharmaceutical companies launching dozens of new products every year. To support effective management, in government-run, public drug plans in Canada, as well as some privately run plans, a formulary is developed, which is a list of drugs and related products that are eligible for coverage under the drug plan. To develop the formularies, public plans consider both how well a drug works and whether these products offer good value for money relative to other treatment options. While there are over a hundred public plans in Canada, there is generally good alignment with regard to the list of drugs that are eligible for coverage across provinces and territories.

Many Canadians are only eligible for public drug coverage with high deductibles or premiums that provide little relief for more routine drug expenses, such as for prescribed contraception and diabetes medications. A national formulary would outline the scope of prescription drugs and related products that all Canadians should have affordable access to under national universal pharmacare.

In 2019, the advisory council on the implementation of national pharmacare, chaired by Dr. Eric Hoskins, recommended a national formulary service, one of the standards for national universal pharmacare. He proposed pharmacare coverage to be phased in, starting with a short list of essential medicines. In budget 2019, the government announced funding for a number of foundational steps towards national pharmacare, including the development of a national formulary. Back in 2022, the government announced continued progress towards this by introducing a pharmacare act and tasking the drug agency to develop a national formulary of essential medicines and a bulk purchasing plan. Preliminary work has already been completed, and a framework and process for developing a future national formulary was recommended.

The panel released its final report in 2022, including giving guiding principles for the formulary and a process for bringing it into place, as well as a sample list of commonly prescribed drugs and related products for three therapeutic areas with a high volume of drug use in Canada. These are cardiovascular disease, diabetes and mental illness. This list has been expanded by looking at equity-seeking groups to make sure that we are closing the gaps in access between different communities in Canada.

Actually, this foundational work is already having real-world impacts. In 2021, our government announced that it would work with the Province of Prince Edward Island on the improving affordable access to prescription drugs initiative. Under this initiative, P.E.I. is receiving funding to add new drugs to its list of publicly covered drugs and to lower the out-of-pocket costs for island residents.

I just want to say that, with the legislation, P.E.I. residents have already saved $2 million in out-of-pocket costs on more than 230,000 prescriptions, and the savings continue. Our government remains firmly committed to taking the next steps in pharmacare, and the legislation today is going to help us do that by providing coverage for contraception and diabetes medicine. This is part of our overall approach to support the provinces to improve health care in Canada, including with a new deal we signed with all the provinces last year to provide better care, as well as making it easier to get access to such things as a medical practitioner in rural areas, including where I live, by providing student loan forgiveness for people to operate there.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:25 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

It being 11:26 p.m., pursuant to order made on Wednesday, May 22, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the report stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on Motion No. 1. A vote on this motion also applies to Motions Nos. 2 to 6 and 8 to 12.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:25 p.m.

Conservative

Rick Perkins Conservative South Shore—St. Margarets, NS

Mr. Speaker, I would request a recorded division, please.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 30th, 2024 / 11:25 p.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

Call in the members.

(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #791

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 31st, 2024 / 12:10 a.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I declare Motion No. 1 defeated. I therefore declare Motions Nos. 2 to 6 and 8 to 12 defeated.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 31st, 2024 / 12:10 a.m.

Liberal

Dan Vandal Liberal Saint Boniface—Saint Vital, MB

moved that Bill C-64, An Act respecting pharmacare, as amended, be concurred in at report stage.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 31st, 2024 / 12:10 a.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

The question is on the motion.

If a member participating in person wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or if a member of a recognized party participating in person wishes to request a recorded division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 31st, 2024 / 12:10 a.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, we request a recorded vote, please.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #792

Pharmacare ActGovernment Orders

May 31st, 2024 / 12:25 a.m.

The Speaker Greg Fergus

I declare the motion carried.