Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada Act

An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is, or will soon become, law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment amends the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 to, among other things,
(a) recognize that every individual in Canada has a right to a healthy environment as provided under that Act;
(b) provide that the Government of Canada must protect that right as provided under that Act, and, in doing so, may balance that right with relevant factors;
(c) require the development of an implementation framework that sets out how that right will be considered in the administration of that Act, and require that research, studies or monitoring activities be conducted to support the Government of Canada in protecting that right;
(d) authorize the Minister of the Environment to add to the Domestic Substances List certain substances that were in commerce in Canada and subject to the Food and Drugs Act between January 1, 1987 and September 13, 2001, and provide that any substance may be deleted from the List when it is no longer in commerce in Canada;
(e) require that the Minister of the Environment and the Minister of Health develop a plan that specifies the substances to which those Ministers are satisfied priority should be given in assessing whether they are toxic or capable of becoming toxic;
(f) provide that any person may request that those Ministers assess a substance;
(g) require the Minister of the Environment to compile a list of substances that that Minister and the Minister of Health have reason to suspect are capable of becoming toxic or that have been determined to be capable of becoming toxic;
(h) require that, when those Ministers conduct or interpret the results of certain assessments — or conduct or interpret the results of a review of decisions of certain governments — in order to determine whether a substance is toxic or capable of becoming toxic, they consider available information on whether there is a vulnerable population in relation to the substance and on the cumulative effects that may result from exposure to the substance in combination with exposure to other substances;
(i) provide that certain substances be classified as substances that pose the highest risk based on, among other things, their properties or characteristics;
(j) require that those Ministers give priority to the total, partial or conditional prohibition of activities in relation to toxic substances that are specified in Part 1 of Schedule 1 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 , or to the total, partial or conditional prohibition of releases of those substances into the environment, when regulations or instruments respecting preventive or control actions in relation to those substances are developed;
(k) expand certain regulation-making, information-gathering and pollution prevention powers under that Act, including by adding a reference to products that may release substances into the environment;
(l) allow the risks associated with certain toxic substances to be managed by preventive or control actions taken under any other Act of Parliament, and the obligations under sections 91 and 92 of the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 to be the responsibility of whoever of the Minister of the Environment or the Minister of Health is best placed to fulfil them;
(m) expand the powers of the Minister of the Environment to vary either the contents of a significant new activity notice with respect to a substance not on the Domestic Substances List or the contents of the List itself with respect to a substance on the List that is subject to the significant new activities provisions of that Act;
(n) extend the requirement, to notify persons of the obligation to comply with the significant new activity provisions of that Act when a substance that is subject to those provisions is transferred to them, so that it applies with respect to substances on the Domestic Substances List, and authorize that Minister to limit by class the persons who are required to be notified of the obligation when a substance that is subject to those provisions is transferred to them; and
(o) require that confidentiality requests made under section 313 of the Act be accompanied by reasons, and to allow the Minister of the Environment to disclose the explicit chemical or biological name of a substance or the explicit biological name of a living organism in certain circumstances.
The enactment also makes related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act to enable the assessment and management of risks to the environment associated with foods, drugs, cosmetics and devices by, among other things,
(a) prohibiting persons from conducting certain activities in respect of a drug unless the Minister of Health has conducted an assessment of the risks to the environment presented by certain substances contained in that drug;
(b) enabling the Minister of Health to take measures in respect of the risks to the environment that a drug may present throughout its life cycle; and
(c) providing the Governor in Council with supporting regulation-making authorities.
Finally, the enactment repeals the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act .

Similar bills

C-28 (43rd Parliament, 2nd session) Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada Act

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other S-5s:

S-5 (2021) An Act to amend the Judges Act
S-5 (2016) Law An Act to amend the Tobacco Act and the Non-smokers’ Health Act and to make consequential amendments to other Acts
S-5 (2014) Law Nááts’ihch’oh National Park Reserve Act
S-5 (2011) Law Financial System Review Act

Votes

May 30, 2023 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act
May 30, 2023 Failed Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act (recommittal to a committee)
May 16, 2023 Passed Concurrence at report stage of Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act
May 16, 2023 Failed Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act (report stage amendment)
May 16, 2023 Passed Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act (report stage amendment)
May 15, 2023 Passed Time allocation for Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act
Nov. 3, 2022 Passed 2nd reading of Bill S-5, An Act to amend the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999, to make related amendments to the Food and Drugs Act and to repeal the Perfluorooctane Sulfonate Virtual Elimination Act

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill S-5 proposes amendments to the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) of 1999. It recognizes the right to a healthy environment and strengthens the foundation for chemicals management, emphasizing protection for vulnerable populations, encouraging safer alternatives, and accounting for cumulative effects. The bill introduces a plan for chemicals management priorities, promotes transparency, and aims to reduce animal testing.

Conservative

  • Supports bill S-5: The Conservative party supports Bill S-5, believing it represents significant progress in addressing environmental challenges and updating the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.
  • Healthy environment definition: Members emphasize the importance of defining what constitutes a "healthy environment" within the bill, expressing concern over potential ambiguity and impacts on provincial jurisdiction; some would have liked to see national standards for clean air and water included in the legislation.
  • Need for concrete results: The party criticizes the government for being heavy on rhetoric but light on concrete environmental achievements, citing reports from the environment commissioner and the UN that indicate shortcomings in meeting environmental targets and protecting species at risk.
  • Consequentialist lens for policy: Environmental policy considerations should be viewed through a consequentialist lens, meaning that whether emissions are justified in a particular case should be evaluated based on the net effects on human security, happiness, economic well-being, and the environment.

NDP

  • Supports the bill: The NDP supports the bill because it enshrines the right to a healthy environment in federal law and updates regulations around toxic chemicals. They acknowledge the bill's shortcomings but recognize it as a step forward, particularly due to amendments they fought for in committee and the Senate.
  • Missed opportunities: The NDP believes the bill missed important opportunities to strengthen environmental protections, including addressing air quality, regulating tailings ponds, and ensuring more robust public and Indigenous consultations regarding genetically engineered organisms.
  • Call for further action: The NDP urges the government to address the bill's shortcomings through future legislation, particularly focusing on enforceability, air quality standards, and transparent risk assessment processes. They express hope that the government will promptly begin crafting a new bill to strengthen CEPA further.

Bloc

  • Bill supported in principle: The Bloc Québécois supports Bill S-5 in principle. However, they emphasize that this support does not imply unconditional agreement, particularly regarding jurisdictional issues and federal intrusion into areas of provincial responsibility.
  • Bill not ambitious enough: The Bloc views Bill S-5 as a technical bill that lacks the ambition required to address the climate crisis adequately. They advocate for bolder actions, like those already in place in Quebec, to enshrine the right to a healthy environment in law.
  • Environmental prevention needed: The bill does not give sufficient attention to pollution prevention plans, a crucial tool for environmental protection. They highlight the importance of shifting the focus from managing pollution after it occurs to preventing it in the first place, as well as lamenting that amendments to include this in the bill were defeated.
  • Criticism of Liberal-Conservative coalition: The Liberal-Conservative coalition is criticized for allegedly prioritizing industry interests over environmental considerations and human health. The party claims the coalition undermined amendments aimed at improving consultation, public participation, and transparency in environmental regulations.

Liberal

  • Support for Bill S-5: Liberal members express strong support for Bill S-5, emphasizing its importance in modernizing the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA) and strengthening environmental protection for Canadians and future generations. They highlight the extensive parliamentary process, including significant contributions from all parties, resulting in a stronger bill through numerous amendments.
  • Right to a healthy environment: The bill recognizes the right to a healthy environment for the first time in Canadian federal law, imposing a duty on the government to protect this right. It will require the development of an implementation framework to ensure the right is considered in the administration of CEPA, emphasizing principles like environmental justice and reconciliation.
  • Modernizing chemicals management: Bill S-5 modernizes Canada's approach to chemicals management by prioritizing the protection of vulnerable populations, encouraging safer alternatives, and considering the cumulative effects of chemical exposure. It introduces a plan of chemicals management priorities with timelines, requires regular reviews, and broadens the scientific basis for risk assessments.
  • Transparency and accountability: The bill includes amendments to enhance openness, transparency, and accountability in environmental and health protections, including timelines and reporting requirements for risk assessment and management of chemicals. It also establishes a more transparent regime for confidential business information and includes provisions to reduce animal testing.

Green

  • Disappointment with Bill S-5: May expresses deep disappointment with Bill S-5, saying that it does not deal with key areas like genetically modified organisms or amendments to the ocean dumping act. She argues that despite the inclusion of the right to a healthy environment, the bill fails to make it enforceable, rendering it a symbolic gesture rather than a meaningful right.
  • Weakening of toxic chemical oversight: May criticizes the changes to the schedule for toxic chemicals, arguing that they weaken the constitutional foundations of the act, potentially to benefit the plastics industry. She emphasizes that the original act focused on toxic chemicals as a health issue and was jointly administered by the Ministers of Health and Environment, establishing a legitimate exercise of federal jurisdiction.
  • Need for public participation: May advocates for meaningful public participation in the legislation, particularly in decisions related to genetically modified organisms. She highlights the importance of incorporating indigenous knowledge and scientific information into the decision-making process, but notes that some within Environment Canada view it as solely a science-based process, potentially excluding public input.
  • Supports NDP amendment: May supports the NDP amendment to restore changes made in the Senate regarding tailings ponds. She criticizes the process of starting the bill in the Senate and the subsequent deletion of important amendments by the House of Commons environment committee.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

I declare Motion No. 2 defeated. I therefore declare Motion No. 3 defeated as well.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

Laurier—Sainte-Marie Québec

Liberal

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

The question is on the motion.

If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes that the motion be carried or carried on division, or wishes to request a recorded division, I invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

The hon. government whip.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC

Mr. Speaker, I believe if you seek it, you will find unanimous consent to apply the results of the previous vote to this vote, with Liberal members voting in favour.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

Conservative

Kerry-Lynne Findlay Conservative South Surrey—White Rock, BC

Mr. Speaker, Conservatives agree to apply the vote with Conservatives voting yea.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

Bloc

Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Salaberry—Suroît, QC

Mr. Speaker, the Bloc Québécois agrees to apply the vote and will vote in favour.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

NDP

Rachel Blaney NDP North Island—Powell River, BC

Mr. Speaker, the NDP agrees to apply the vote and will be voting in favour.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Speaker, the Green Party agrees to apply the votes and votes no.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:35 p.m.

Independent

Kevin Vuong Independent Spadina—Fort York, ON

Mr. Speaker, I agree to apply the results of the previous vote, voting in favour.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:40 p.m.

Independent

Han Dong Independent Don Valley North, ON

Mr. Speaker, I agree to apply, voting yes.

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:40 p.m.

Independent

Alain Rayes Independent Richmond—Arthabaska, QC

Mr. Speaker, I also agree to apply the vote and will be voting in favour.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #326

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:40 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

I declare the motion carried.

(Motion agreed to)

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada ActGovernment Orders

May 16th, 2023 / 3:40 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

I wish to inform the House that, because of the deferred recorded divisions, Government Orders will be extended by 19 minutes.