An Act to repeal the Clarity Act

Sponsor

Christine Normandin  Bloc

Introduced as a private member’s bill. (These don’t often become law.)

Status

Outside the Order of Precedence (a private member's bill that hasn't yet won the draw that determines which private member's bills can be debated), as of June 2, 2026

Subscribe to a feed (what's a feed?) of speeches and votes in the House related to Bill C-279.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment repeals the Clarity Act .

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-279s:

C-279 (2022) An Act to amend the Criminal Code (criminal organizations)
C-279 (2021) An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (voting age)
C-279 (2016) An Act to amend the Canada Elections Act (length of election period)
C-279 (2013) An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code (gender identity)

Clarity ActRoutine Proceedings

June 2nd, 2026 / 10:05 a.m.

Bloc

Christine Normandin Bloc Saint-Jean, QC

moved for leave to introduce C‑279, An Act to repeal the Clarity Act.

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise in the House today to introduce Bill C‑279, an act to repeal the Clarity Act. This bill simply seeks to repeal the federal Clarity Act, which allows Parliament to override the will of the people by a simple majority vote of 50% plus one.

The Clarity Act does two things. First, it allows the House of Commons to determine whether a referendum question is sufficiently clear before a referendum takes place. This is particularly paternalistic and impugns the intelligence of the public by assuming that people are unable to think for themselves and understand a question. Second, following a referendum, the Clarity Act allows the House to rule that the majority was not clear, that there was no majority because of the turnout, the percentage of votes in favour of the secessionist option or the substance of the debates. In short, the House of Commons can tell millions of people that their voice did not count based on 343 votes in the House with a potential majority of a few votes off from 50% plus one.

Bill C‑279 also aims to uphold certain basic democratic principles, which were reiterated by the National Assembly of Quebec when it voted unanimously in favour of the principle. That means both federalists and separatists, across all parties, are rejecting the Clarity Act and pointing out that 50% plus one is a clear majority and that, in the case of Quebec, it is up to Quebec alone to decide its future.

Again, our bill is simple. It simply aims to repeal the abomination and democratic aberration that is the Clarity Act.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)