Evidence of meeting #13 for Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan in the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

We'll call the meeting to order. This is a meeting of the Special Committee on the Canadian Mission in Afghanistan. This is our 13th meeting.

Today we're dealing with committee business, and it's a continuation of last week's meeting.

Yes, sir?

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

Laurie Hawn Conservative Edmonton Centre, AB

I have a point of order. Committee business is normally discussed in camera. I propose that we move the meeting in camera.

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

Okay. We have a motion to move in camera.

All those in favour please signify.

All opposed please signify.

The vote is tied.

3:35 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

I thought this was going to be an easier meeting than the last one, which started off well.

3:35 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

I want to refer to the fact that when we were last discussing the motion that is in front of us, we were actually in public. I'm not sure that it would make sense, for continuity purposes, to go from being in public discussing the motion to being in camera. One thing that was mentioned at the last meeting—I certainly mentioned it—is that it is important for us to be doing our business in public. I don't see any reason why something such as a motion we're discussing on committee business would go in camera. In fact, I'm not sure of the rationale for it.

In terms of continuity and making sure we are following the continuity from last meeting, and since I don't know of any rule that says we are to go in camera when discussing committee business, I suggest we stay in public.

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

We've had the vote, so--

3:35 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

We have a vote. Maybe we could have the vote over, because I see that--

3:35 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!

3:35 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

To the chair, we were public when we were discussing committee business last meeting, so I don't see the rationale or the precedent for this.

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

Well, it has fallen in my lap. We had a vote, and it was tied, and I have to break the tie. It was in your absence.

3:35 p.m.

An hon. member

[Inaudible--Editor]

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

Well, I asked your folks, and they were fine to go ahead.

It puts me in an awkward position.

3:35 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

If we have a motion to have the vote again, you won't be in that awkward position, Chair.

Could I pose the motion to vote again?

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

No. We've already had the motion.

Following tradition, Mr. Dewar, given the fact that we have always dealt with committee business in camera and at that last meeting we made, I think, an exception to that, I am going to follow what is traditionally done. I'm going to vote in support of the motion to go in camera.

3:35 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

On a point of order, Chair, what tradition are we talking about?

3:35 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

This committee has always dealt with future committee business in camera.

3:35 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

I'd like some reference to that at some point, because I'm not aware of that.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

We've dealt with that.

3:40 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

I'm going to challenge you on your decision, Chair.

I'm challenging the fact that you're saying there is a precedent for going in camera. There's no writing here that says that. You're just talking about interpretation of how business is conducted. We could have had a vote easily go the other way; it was simply that the numbers weren't present. Just to say that normally we do it this way and therefore I'm voting this way doesn't....

There's no rule written here, and I'm challenging that premise. You're saying that's how we normally do things, and I'm challenging on the basis of asking, based on what?

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

In my memory, that's how it has been at this committee and others.

3:40 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

Well, my memory is that at the last meeting we were in public and were discussing a motion that was committee business, and we all agreed to that.

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Rick Casson

That was done on a motion.

3:40 p.m.

NDP

Paul Dewar NDP Ottawa Centre, ON

If I'm challenging the Chair, it's not debatable. Isn't that right?

3:40 p.m.

Conservative

Laurie Hawn Conservative Edmonton Centre, AB

The vote has been taken.