The fact that Mr. Colvin wrote reports is now a matter of public record. It's well known. It's not exactly a state secret any longer. What's in them is not entirely clear because much of the information has been blacked out.
Mr. Colvin went to Afghanistan in April 2006 and stayed for a considerable period of time. Is it fair to assume that some reports must have been received by the government that led them to conclude that further steps were necessary to protect Canada's reputation and to protect the treatment of prisoners?